Search Results for "authorization"

889 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 889 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Appointment of Education Extension Officer to Sign Salary Bills of Private School. Court Holds That Respondent No. 3 Exceeded Jurisdiction Under Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977 and Rules, 1981.

The petitioner, Dnyanganga Shikshan Sanstha, a private educational institution running Dyanganga Public School, challenged an order dated 26.12.2017 p...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Copyright Infringement Case Due to Lack of Authorization. The court held that the complaint under Sections 63B and 69 of the Copyright Act, 1957, was not filed by a person authorized by the copyright owner, rendering the FIR an abuse of process.

The petitioners, Anand Palan and Sheetal Palan, filed a criminal writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India and Section 482 of the C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Trust Property Encroachment Case — Defendant Acquitted of Adverse Possession Claim. Suit for Possession by Trust Held Not Barred by Limitation as Encroachment is Continuing Wrong Under Section 23 of Limitation Act, 1963.

The case involves a second appeal filed by Namdeo Khedkar (appellant/defendant) against the judgment of the Joint District Judge, Chandrapur, which re...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Demolition of Sheds by Municipal Corporation. Petitioner Failed to Produce Authorization Under Section 351 of Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888, Hence Demolition Upheld.

The petitioner, M/s Sub Vijay International Pvt Ltd, owned property bearing CTS No. 11A in Aksa, Borivali, Mumbai. On 13th April 1999, the Deputy Cont...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals of Accused in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Sections 42 and 50 of NDPS Act. Conviction for Possession of Hashish Set Aside as Search and Seizure Were Conducted Without Proper Authorization and Without Informing Accused of Their Rights.

The case involves two criminal appeals filed by Satyawan Pagi (A1) and Vimal Singh (A2) against their conviction and sentence under Section 20(b)(ii)(...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against BMC Demolition Notice for Unauthorized Construction. Notice under Section 351 of BMC Act, 1888 Held Valid as Plaintiff Failed to Prove Title or Authorization.

The appellant, Namdev Pandurang Panchal, filed a suit seeking a declaration that a notice dated 19.10.2001 under Section 351 of the Mumbai Municipal C...