Search Results for "arbitrator award"

1938 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1938 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Review Petition in Arbitration Appointment Case — No Error Apparent on Face of Record. Court holds that review cannot be used as an appeal and that the arbitrator's appointment under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 is not subject to review on merits.

The petitioners, Roptonal Ltd (formerly Indian Film Company (Cyprus) Ltd) and Viacom 18 Media Pvt. Ltd., filed a review petition in the Bombay High Co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition to Set Aside Arbitral Award in Cotton Supply Dispute. Consolidation of Claims from Nine Contracts with Identical Terms Does Not Violate Fundamental Policy of Indian Law Under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, BST Textile Mills Pvt. Ltd., entered into nine contracts with the respondent, The Cotton Corporation of India Ltd., for the purchase o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Arbitrator Despite Death of Named Arbitrators in Arbitration Clause. Clause 21 of Agreement Construed as Valid Arbitration Agreement Under Section 7 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The Applicant, Global Cements Ltd., entered into an agreement for sale with the Respondent, The Associated Cement Companies Ltd., on 16 December 1989....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Arbitration Petition Under Section 14, Setting Aside Arbitrator's Order Dismissing Substitution Application. Arbitrator's Termination of Proceedings on Grounds of Delay Held Perverse, Amounting to Refusal to Perform Functions and Not an Interim Award Under Section 34.

The dispute arose from a partnership firm where the original claimant, father of the petitioners, had initiated arbitration proceedings in 2004. After...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Challenge to Arbitrator's Interlocutory Order on Summoning of Documents. Court Considers Maintainability of Writ Petitions Against Interlocutory Orders Under Articles 226 and 227 in Light of SBP & Co. v. Patel Engineering.

The dispute arose between Dodballapur Integrated Textile Park Limited and the claimants, Vinod G. Jain and Premalatha G. Jain, under a sub-lease agree...