Search Results for "arbitration and conciliation act 1996"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "arbitration and conciliation act 1996"

2218 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2218 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Employee's Section 37 Appeal, Allows Company's Appeals in Arbitration Dispute Under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Finding of Voluntary Resignation Upheld as Arbitrator's Award Did Not Suffer From Perversity; Trial Court's Modification Set Aside, Original Award Restored.

26 Sep 2025

The proceedings arise from an employment dispute between a Vice President of a private limited company and the company itself, culminating in arbitrat...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging MSME Council Award for Lack of Jurisdiction — Alternative Remedy Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act Available. Petitioner's Challenge to Award Under Section 18 of MSMED Act Rejected as Court Finds No Exceptional Circumstances to Bypass Statutory Appeal Remedy.

22 Oct 2024

The petitioner, M/s. Duro Shox Pvt. Ltd., a private limited company, challenged an award dated 02.02.2024 passed by the Micro and Small Enterprises Fa...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Enforcement of Foreign Award in Favor of Petitioner in Arbitration Dispute. Court Holds That Award Does Not Violate Public Policy and Condoned Delay of 273 Days Under Section 5 of Limitation Act, 1963.

6 Oct 2015

The petitioner, M/s. Louis Dreyfus Commodities Suisse S.A., a Swiss company, entered into a contract with the respondent, Sakuma Exports Limited, an I...

High Court

Bombay High Court Directs Cooperative Court to Decide Interim Application in Society Redevelopment Dispute. Minority Members' Challenge to Resolutions Led to High Court Direction Under Section 9 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to Avoid Delay in Redevelopment.

23 Dec 2021

The case pertains to a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 filed by MP Space Dynamics Pvt. Ltd., the developer, aga...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Examines Challenge to Commercial Court’s Dismissal of Section 34 Petitions Upholding Arbitral Awards on Escalation Claims. Dispute Arises Out of Delays in Five Hospital Renovation Projects Undertaken by Contractor and Alleged Breach of Contract by Government Entities.

19 Sep 2024

The appellant, a contractor, was the successful bidder for 14 projects relating to the renovation and expansion of various government hospitals in Kar...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Adjudicates Appeal Against High Court's Order Setting Aside Arbitral Award Under Section 37 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Dispute Involves Interpretation of Contractual Notice Requirement as Condition Precedent and Applicability of Waiver and Estoppel in EPC Contract.

1 Jan 1970

The dispute arose from multiple Engineering, Procurement, and Construction (EPC) agreements between SEPCO Electric Power Construction Corporation (con...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Bank's Arbitration Petitions Against Guarantors Due to Limitation and Lack of Arbitration Agreement. The court held that claims against guarantors were barred by limitation and that the arbitration clause in the loan agreement did not extend to guarantors who were not signatories.

30 Nov -0001

The case involves three arbitration petitions filed by Abhyudaya Co-operative Bank Ltd. against various respondents, including Rainproof Exports Pvt. ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal Against Interim Injunction in Commercial Dispute Under Section 9 of Arbitration Act — Injunction Granted Without Considering Balance of Convenience and Irreparable Injury Set Aside. The court held that an interim injunction under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC requires satisfaction of all three principles: prima facie case, balance of convenience, and irreparable injury.

22 Mar 2021

The appellants, owners of a property, entered into a development agreement with the respondent developer. Disputes arose, and the respondent filed an ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Section 11 Application for Appointment of Arbitrator Despite SARFAESI and RDDB Act Objections — Arbitration Agreement in Sanction Letter Held Enforceable and Not Barred by Statutory Remedies. The court held that Section 34 of the SARFAESI Act and Section 18 of the RDDB Act do not bar arbitration proceedings, and the applicant's claim under the Sanction Letter dated 19th August 2019 is arbitrable.

15 Oct 2024

The applicant, Tata Capital Limited, filed an application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking appointment of an arb...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Appointment Case — Withdrawal of Section 11 Petition Does Not Bar Fresh Application Under IBC. Order 23 Rule 1 CPC Not Applicable to Arbitration Petitions; Section 9 IBC and Section 11 Arbitration Act Seek Different Reliefs.

18 Nov 2024

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by M/s HPCL Bio-Fuels Ltd. against the judgment of the Bombay High Court which had appointed a sole arbitra...

25 26 27 28 29

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)