Search Results for "amendment rules 2022"

1286 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1286 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Termination of Employee Without Inquiry. Termination of a teacher without holding a disciplinary inquiry violates principles of natural justice and Section 5 of the Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977.

The petitioner, Bharat Ramchandra Shirsat, was an employee of N.E.S High School and Junior College, managed by Respondent No.1 Trust. He was terminate...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Eviction Suit — Confirms Decree for Possession Based on Valid Sale Deed and Caretaker Agreement. Agreement for Sale and Subsequent Sale Deed Transfer Title; Occupier as Caretaker Must Vacate After Expiry of Term.

The respondent/plaintiff filed Regular Civil Suit No.819 of 2016 for possession and arrears of rent against the defendant, who had sold the suit prope...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Rejection of Temporary Injunction in Contract Dispute. Court holds that balance of convenience and prima facie case did not favor grant of injunction under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC.

The Appellant, Chitali Bottling Limited, filed a Special Civil Suit No.95 of 2020 before the 19th Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division, Pune, seeking a ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Tenant Defendants in Possession Suit, Sets Aside Injunction. Court holds that tenants in possession cannot be injuncted without a decree for possession, and a suit for injunction simpliciter is maintainable against a landlord.

The case involves two appeals arising from a common order of the Learned Single Judge dated 6th September 2021. The Appellant in Appeal No.551 of 2019...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Union's Challenge to Tribunal Order Refusing to Treat Company's Closure Application as Withdrawn. Held that the Tribunal's refusal was not perverse and the Union's application was premature under Section 25-O of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by the General Motors Employees Union challenging an order of the Industrial Tribunal dated 28.04.2023 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim for Businessman with 50% Disability. Compensation enhanced from Rs. 3,50,000 to Rs. 9,27,000 by applying correct multiplier of 18, adding future prospects, and not deducting personal expenses.

The appellant, Ramchand Kishnani, a businessman aged 42, filed a claim petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, seeking compensatio...