Search Results for "allottee rights"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "allottee rights"

306 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 306 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Directs Demarcation of Dharavi Koliwada Boundaries in Dharavi Redevelopment Project Dispute. The court issued a writ of mandamus to the State of Maharashtra and other respondents to expeditiously determine and finalise the outer boundaries of Dharavi Koliwada, finding inordinate delay in the discharge of official duty.

18 Apr 2026

The petitioner, Dharavi Koli Jamat Trust, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of certiorari to call fo...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Coal Supply Dispute — No Ground for Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act. Court upholds award of damages for short supply of coal, finding no patent illegality or conflict with public policy.

25 Jun 2026

The petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 was filed by Mahaguj Collieries Ltd. (original respondent) challenging an ...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging School Fee Hike as Not Maintainable. Fee Fixation in Private Unaided Schools is a Contractual Matter, Not Subject to Public Interest Litigation.

4 Sep 2014

The petitioners, minors represented by their fathers, filed a Public Interest Litigation under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Kar...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeals by Developer in Possession Suits — Concurrent Findings of Fact Cannot Be Reopened Under Section 100 CPC. Suits for possession based on title and prior possession were decreed; no substantial question of law arose.

17 Sep 2019

The appellant, M/s. Samruddhi Developers, a partnership firm, filed four second appeals under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challe...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals Against RERA Orders on Pre-2017 Agreements, Upholding Retrospective Application of MahaRERA. Court holds that Section 3(1) of RERA applies to ongoing projects even if agreements were executed before the Act came into force.

11 Sep 2020

The judgment concerns three connected second appeals filed before the Bombay High Court under the Civil Appellate Jurisdiction. The appeals were filed...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal by Depository Against Arbitral Award for Lost Shares Due to Third-Party Fraud. Court Holds That Depository Not Liable Absent Negligence or Breach of Contract Under Section 12(1-A) of SEBI Act, 1992.

2 Jul 2026

The case involves an appeal by Central Depository Services (India) Ltd. (CDSL) against a judgment of a learned Single Judge dated 01/12/2025, which up...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in IBC Section 7 Application — Cumulative Redeemable Preference Shares Held as Debt, Not Investment. The Court held that CRPS constitute a debt under Section 3(11) of IBC, 2016, and the appellant is a financial creditor entitled to file an application under Section 7.

9 Dec 2025

The appeal arises from the dismissal of the appellant's application under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC) by the NCLT and ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Challenge to CIDCO's Demand for Premium on Additional FSI in Waluj Growth Centre; Petitioners Argue Sanctioned DCR Provides Basic FSI of 1.5 and No Premium is Chargeable, While CIDCO Contends Unauthorized Construction and Suppression of Facts

8 Jan 2019

The petitioners, three individuals engaged in business, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging communication...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Union of India's Petition Challenging Tribunal's Order Allowing Voluntary Retirement of Assistant. Rule 48-A of CCS Pension Rules Prevails Over Administrative Circulars and Fundamental Rule 56(k)(1) — Employer's Rejection on Grounds of Staff Shortage Held Arbitrary.

26 Jul 2024

The Union of India and others (petitioners) challenged the order dated 01.03.2024 of the Central Administrative Tribunal, Mumbai Bench, which allowed ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Promoter's Appeal in RERA Interest Dispute — Interest on Delayed Possession to Run from 1 July 2016, Not 1 January 2020, But COVID Period Excluded from Interest Liability. The court held that the promoter is liable to pay interest from the date of default as per the agreement, but the COVID-19 pandemic period is excluded from interest liability.

23 Jan 2024

The case involves two appeals filed by M/s. Pragatej Builders And Developers Pvt. Ltd. (the promoter) against a common judgment and order dated 7 Febr...

25 26 27 28 29

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)