Search Results for "Tribunal"

935 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 935 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Facilitates Settlement in Consumer Dispute Involving Flat Buyers, Builder, and Bank Under Consumer Protection Act. Court Records Amicable Resolution Terms Including Waiver of Charges, Interest Discounts, and Payment Adjustments, Directing Compliance with Timelines.

The Supreme Court dealt with appeals under Section 23 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, against a common judgment of the National Consumer Dispute...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses State's Appeal in Seniority Dispute Under Karnataka Civil Services Rules. Transfer of Government Employee at Own Request with Consent to Specific Seniority Terms Governs Seniority Fixation in New Post, Not Original Appointment Date.

The dispute arose from the transfer of a government employee from the post of Staff Nurse to First Division Assistant in the Karnataka State services....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Allows Appeals by Appellant Creditor in IBC Case -- Sets Aside Orders Directing Appellant to Approach GIDC Appellate Authority and Remitting Resolution Plan -- Termination of Lease During Moratorium Held Invalid Under Section 14 of IBC

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) allowed two appeals filed by the Resolution Professional (RP) and the largest financial creditor o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Clarifies Eligibility Criteria for Food Safety Officers: Master’s Degree in Relevant Subjects Valid for Appointment. Court Rules in Favor of Appellants, Quashes High Court’s Decision on FSO Qualifications

The term “degree” under Section 22(3) of the UGC Act includes Bachelor’s, Master’s, and Doctorate degrees, and any restriction to exclude Mast...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Sets Aside NCDRC Order : No Privity of Contract Between Parties, Respondent Not a ‘Consumer’ Under Consumer Protection Act, 1986. Court Holds No Tripartite Agreement Proven, Respondent Not Entitled to Compensation Under Consumer Protection Act, 1986

Privity of Contract Essential for Consumer Status: The Court reiterated that for a person to qualify as a ‘consumer’ under the CPA, t...