Search Results for "Sarla Verma multiplier"

851 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 851 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Enhances Compensation for Injured Claimants in Motor Accident Case, Upholds Negligence Finding Against Insurer. Compensation for father and son enhanced based on medical expenses, loss of earning capacity, and future medical expenses under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The case arises from a motor accident that occurred on June 30, 2018, at about 21:30 hours, when a father and son duo were riding their TVS XL Motorcy...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal Against Compensation Award in Motor Accident Claim — Negligence Proved and Quantum Upheld. Deceased's Income Reduced to Rs.2,800 per Month but 50% Future Prospects and Multiplier of 18 Applied Correctly.

The case arises from a motor accident claim filed by the parents of a deceased 25-year-old man who died in a vehicular accident. The claimants, Ramrao...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal and Partly Allows Claimants' Cross-Objection in Motor Accident Compensation Case. The court upheld the Tribunal's finding of negligence and enhanced compensation by applying 40% future prospects under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The case arises from a motor accident on 20.09.2020, where the deceased, Mukeshbhai Ramabhai Dave, was riding a motorcycle and was hit from behind by ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Insurance Company's Appeals in Motor Accident Claims, Reduces Compensation for Death of Three Pillion Riders. Held that Contributory Negligence of Deceased Pillion Riders Must Be Considered When They Were Traveling in a Goods Vehicle in Violation of Permit Conditions.

The New India Assurance Company Limited filed four first appeals under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, challenging the common judgment an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Upholds Compensation for Injured Claimants. Tractor Accident Victim Awarded Rs.1,50,000 with 6% Interest for Fracture Injuries Under Section 166 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The case arises from a motor accident claim filed by Venkatesh and Neelamma, husband and wife, who sustained injuries in a tractor accident on 19.10.2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Allows Appeals for Enhanced Compensation in Motor Accident Claims — Truck Driver Held Solely Negligent, Insurance Company Liable. Compensation Enhanced by Applying Correct Multiplier and Adding Future Prospects Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The present appeals were filed by the original claimants under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, being aggrieved by the common judgment and...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Negligence of Jeep Driver Upheld. Compensation of Rs.12,99,600/- with 9% Interest Awarded to Legal Heirs of Deceased Motorcyclist Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The case arises from a motor accident claim petition filed by the legal heirs of the deceased, Ajayji Dineshji Thakor, who died in a road accident on ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal and Partly Allows Claimants' Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Negligence of Deceased Rider Established but Compensation Enhanced. Future Prospects, Multiplier, and Conventional Heads Recalculated as per Pranay Sethi and Sarla Verma.

The case arises from a motor accident that occurred on 20.06.2016, when the deceased Yashawant Dafale was riding a motorcycle bearing registration No....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Writ Petition Challenging Taxability of Interest Received on Enhanced Motor Accident Compensation. Petitioner Claims Interest is Capital Receipt and Not Taxable; Revenue Relies on Sections 56(2)(viii) and 145A(b) of Income Tax Act, 1961.

The petitioner, a 48-year-old man rendered paraplegic and bedridden since a road accident at age 8, filed a writ petition challenging the taxability o...