Search Results for "MRTU & PULP Act, 1971"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "MRTU & PULP Act, 1971"

522 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 522 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Municipal Corporation's Petition, Quashes Stay on Second Show Cause Notice in Disciplinary Proceeding. Labour Court Exceeded Jurisdiction by Interfering at Pre-Decision Stage Under MRTU and PULP Act, 1971.

5 Dec 2015

The Nanded Waghala City Municipal Corporation (Petitioner) challenged the order dated 29.07.2015 of the Labour Court at Nanded in Complaint (ULP) No.1...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Letters Patent Appeals by Employer in Service Matter — Termination of Workmen Without Section 25-F Compliance Held Illegal. Reinstatement with Continuity of Service and Back Wages Upheld as Non-Compliance with Section 25-F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Renders Termination Void.

7 Feb 2013

The case involves two Letters Patent Appeals filed by Maharashtra State Power Generation Company Ltd. (the appellant) against the common order of a Si...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals in Industrial Dispute Over Transfer of Undertaking — Remand Order Set Aside. Transfer of undertaking under Section 25FF of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 does not automatically entitle workmen to continuity of service and benefits unless conditions of Section 25FF are satisfied.

29 Nov 2018

The case involves two Letters Patent Appeals arising from a judgment of a learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court in Writ Petition No.8099 of 20...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Industrial Court Order in Promotion Dispute Due to Non-Joinder of Affected Parties. Seniority-Based Promotion Claim Fails as Persons Promoted in Supersession Were Not Impleaded as Respondents Under MRTU and PULP Act.

11 Sep 2015

The petitioner, Parmatma Ek Sevak Nagarik Sahakari Bank, challenged the judgment and order dated 27.08.2008 passed by the Industrial Court in Complain...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Bank's Petition Challenging Gratuity Payment to Terminated Employee. Forfeiture of Gratuity Under Section 4(6) of Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 Requires Loss of Property or Moral Turpitude, Not Mere Misconduct.

7 Jul 2026

The petitioner, The Jalgaon District Central Co-operative Bank Limited, challenged an order dated 09.10.2024 passed by the Appellate Authority/Industr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Criminal Writ Petition Challenging Sanction for Prosecution Under Prevention of Corruption Act — Sanctioning Authority's Discretion Upheld. Sanction order under Section 19 of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 is administrative; court cannot interfere unless perverse or based on no material.

1 Mar 2011

The petitioner, Uttam Dattatraya Kahane, filed a Criminal Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court, A...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Reference Order in Industrial Dispute Over Contract Labour - Lack of Employer-Employee Relationship and Non-Application of Mind by Government. The court held that the government must prima facie satisfy itself about the existence of an employer-employee relationship before referring a dispute concerning contract labour under Section 10(1) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

18 Jul 2013

The petitioner, Voltas Limited, challenged an order of reference dated 9 July 2012 made by the State of Maharashtra under Section 10(1) of the Industr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Appeals in Industrial Dispute Cases — Workmen Entitled to Reinstatement with Back Wages as Retrenchment Without Compliance with Section 25-F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Was Illegal. The court upheld the Labour Court's finding that retrenchment of workmen who had completed 240 days of service was void for non-compliance with Section 25-F, and reinstatement with full back wages was justified.

30 Nov -0001

The appellant, Godrej Industries Ltd. (formerly Godrej Soaps Ltd.), employed the respondents as workmen. The respondents were retrenched by the appell...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Upholds Labour Court Award in Favor of Workman in MSRTC Dismissal Case — 25% Back Wages Granted for Procedural Violation. Dismissal Quashed as Enquiry Officer Was Not Appointed by Competent Authority Under Section 6(6) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

9 Aug 2019

The petitioner, the Divisional Controller of Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation (MSRTC), challenged the judgment and award dated 4.8.2018 of...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Corporation's Challenge to Reinstatement of Employees in Industrial Dispute. Termination of Employees Without Compliance with Section 25F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Held Illegal and Reinstatement with Back Wages Upheld.

30 Nov -0001

This batch of writ petitions arises from a common dispute between the Maharashtra State Handloom Corporation (the Corporation) and its employees. The ...

25 26 27 28 29

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)