Search Results for "Hindu family partition"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Hindu family partition"

669 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 669 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Property Declaration and Possession Suit — Will Construction and Execution Proved. Court holds that execution of will must be proved by examining at least one attesting witness under Section 68 of Indian Evidence Act, 1872, and that a will is not required to be registered under Section 18 of the Registration Act, 1908.

25 Oct 2018

The appeal arises from a judgment and decree dated 17.01.2004 in O.S.No.16271/2001 on the file of the XXVIII Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge,...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Suit for Possession and Mesne Profits — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Disturbed Under Section 100 CPC. The court held that the plaintiff's title as sole heir was established and the defendant failed to prove adverse possession.

30 Nov -0001

The second appeal arose from a suit for possession and mesne profits filed by the original plaintiff (since deceased, represented by legal heirs) agai...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dharwad Bench Examines Appeal and Cross-Objection Against Partial Decree in Suit for Declaration and Injunction Involving Adoption and Revenue Entries. The court considered the maintainability of the appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, in light of the alternative remedy of revision under Section 136 of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964.

1 Aug 2017

The suit O.S. No.57/2010 was filed by the plaintiff (appellant in RFA No.4174/2012) before the Principal Senior Civil Judge, Bagalkot, seeking declara...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Property Suit, Sets Aside Concurrent Findings of Courts Below. Court Holds That Plaintiffs Failed to Prove Title and Possession Over Suit Property, and That the Trial Court Erred in Decreeing the Suit Without Proper Consideration of Evidence.

30 Nov -0001

The case involves a property dispute between the appellants (original defendants) and the respondents (original plaintiffs) over agricultural land. Th...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revision Petition in Property Suit — Upholds Trial Court's Refusal to Reopen Evidence. Court holds that the trial court did not err in rejecting application under Order 18 Rule 17 CPC for recalling witnesses, as the petitioners failed to demonstrate that the evidence sought to be adduced was not within their knowledge earlier.

14 Sep 2020

The case arises from a civil revision petition filed under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) by the petitioners (defendants in th...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Order Refusing to Reopen Evidence in Partition Suit — Petitioner Failed to Demonstrate Sufficient Cause for Recalling Witness Under Order 18 Rule 17 CPC

18 Dec 2023

The petitioner, Channabasappa S/o Shivappa Hosamani, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Order Refusing to Set Aside Ex-Parte Decree in Partition Suit. Petitioner Failed to Show Sufficient Cause for Non-Appearance Despite Having Knowledge of Proceedings and Filing Written Statement.

28 Oct 2025

The petitioner, Smt. Sokkamma (since deceased, represented by her LR M. Byrappa), filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeals in Property Dispute, Upholds Concurrent Findings of Fact. No substantial question of law arises under Section 100 CPC as findings are based on evidence and not perverse.

30 Nov -0001

The judgment involves four second appeals arising from a property dispute between Arun s/o Narayanrao Kale (original plaintiff) and the legal represen...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal Filed by Defendants Against Decree Setting Aside Earlier Partition Decree on Grounds of Limitation and Failure to Plead Fraud. Suit for Setting Aside Decree on Fraud Allegations Dismissed as Time-Barred Under Article 123 of Limitation Act, 1963, and for Lack of Material Particulars of Fraud.

27 Nov 2019

The appeal arose from a suit for declaration and setting aside a preliminary decree passed in an earlier partition suit. The original suit had been fi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeals in Property Suit — Concurrent Findings Set Aside Due to Non-Application of Mind by First Appellate Court. First Appellate Court Failed to Independently Re-Appreciate Evidence, Rendering Its Judgment Perverse and Liable to Be Set Aside Under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

30 Nov -0001

The present matter involves two second appeals arising from a property dispute between the appellants, Bhagirathibai and Wanmala, and the respondents,...

25 26 27 28 29

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)