Search Results for "Goa Commission"

880 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 880 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Upholds Conviction for Murder and Destruction of Evidence in Brutal Killing of Mentally Challenged Victim. Life Imprisonment and Fine Affirmed Based on Circumstantial Evidence Including DNA, Recovery of Weapon, and Motive of Insurance Fraud.

The appellant, Janardhan Kokre, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, South Goa, for the murder of Dilip Sadashiv Naik, a mentally challenged person, u...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Attempt to Murder in Revenge Attack After Rejected Marriage Proposal. Section 307 IPC conviction sustained as victim's consistent testimony and medical evidence proved intention to cause death.

The appellant, Andre Fernandes, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge-1, Panaji, Goa, for the offence punishable under Section 307 of the Ind...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court at Goa Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Double Murder and Robbery Based on Circumstantial Evidence. Chain of Circumstances Complete and Accused Failed to Explain Incriminating Facts Under Section 313 CrPC.

The appellant, Rajesab Mujawar, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, North Goa, Panaji in Sessions Case No. 20/2008 for the murder of Shekappa Bhandar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Upholds Conviction of Appellants in Kidnapping for Ransom Case Under Section 364-A IPC — Life Sentence Confirmed Based on Circumstantial Evidence and Identification of Victim and Accused.

The case involves three appeals filed by Mohammad Imdar Ali (A-4), Srinivas Gauramkondu (A-2), and Suraj Kumar Jha (A-3) against their conviction and ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Executing Court's Refusal to Stay Execution in Mundkar Rights Claim. Court holds that mere filing of a declaration suit before Mamlatdar does not create a right to stay execution proceedings under Order XXI Rule 97, 99, 101 CPC.

The petitioners, Lawrance Pereira and Juliana Pereira, filed Writ Petition No. 611 of 2023 challenging the order dated 06.09.2023 passed by the Execut...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010159832015_1

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for 3rd Financial Upgradation Under MACPS — Petitioner Denied Benefit Despite 30 Years of Service. Court holds that Time Bound Promotional Scheme benefits cannot be set off against MACPS upgradations as they are separate schemes with different objectives.

The Petitioner, Govind R. Mashelkar, was initially appointed as a Round Forester on 02.12.1974 in the Forest Department of Government of Goa. He was p...