Search Results for "Discovery and inspection"

295 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 295 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Delivers Judgment in Criminal Appeals Arising from Sessions Case No. 215 of 2006. Appeals Challenge Conviction Under Sections 302 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code.

In the present matter, the appellants, original accused Nos. 1 to 4, along with two other acquitted co-accused, were tried for the murder of six perso...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Considers Bail Applications of Accused Persons in Murder Case Registered at Kamakshipalya Police Station. Petitioners, Accused of Offences Including Murder and Kidnapping, Seek Regular Bail After Rejection by Sessions Court Under Section 439 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru heard a batch of criminal petitions filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (and Sect...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Union of India's Appeals in National Highways Act Land Acquisition Cases — Section 3J Not Violative of Article 14. The Court held that the non-grant of solatium and interest under the National Highways Act, 1956 is not discriminatory and the Act is a complete code.

The Supreme Court, in a batch of appeals filed by the Union of India, considered the validity of the non-grant of solatium and interest under the Nati...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Eyewitness Testimony and Material Contradictions. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Dilip Namdeo Gade, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Ahmednagar, for the murder of Pushpa Nakade under Section 302 IPC an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder and Robbery Based on Circumstantial Evidence. Appellant convicted under Section 302 IPC for murder and Sections 392/397 IPC for robbery, with life imprisonment and seven years rigorous imprisonment respectively.

The appellant, Girvarsingh Bhagwatsingh Devda, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Dindoshi, for the murder of Nirmala Premji Vora and for...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as sole eyewitness turned hostile and circumstantial evidence failed to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Nivrutti Ninaji Ghule, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Khamgaon, for the murder of his niece-in-law, Sharda, under Sect...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Passes Order on Interim Plea Over Yes Bank Management Rights Claimed by Heirs of Ashok Kapur. Core Issue Involves Interpretation of Articles of Association Regarding Heritability of Co-founder's Defined Privileges Following His Death in 2008 Mumbai Terror Attacks.

The judgment deals with a Notice of Motion taken out by the legal heirs of late Ashok Kapur, co-founder of Yes Bank, who perished in the November 2008...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Criminal Appeals Against Conviction for Kidnapping, Gang Rape, and Murder of a 3½-Year-Old Girl. Trial Court Convicted Under Sections 363, 366, 377, 302, 201 Read with 34 IPC Based on Circumstantial Evidence.

The Bombay High Court heard criminal appeals filed by four accused/appellants against their conviction by the Additional Sessions Judge, Greater Bomba...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Striking Off Wife's Defence for Breach of Access Order in Divorce Proceedings. Family Court's Power Under Section 24 of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 Includes Striking Off Defence for Non-Compliance with Interim Orders.

The case involves a writ petition filed by the wife, Mrs. Vimi Vinod Chopra, challenging the order of the Family Court No. 4, Mumbai dated 13.10.2010,...