Search Results for "Binding settlement"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...

Search Results for "Binding settlement"

1650 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1650 result(s)

High Court

High Court Dismisses Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act, Upholds Arbitral Award and District Court Order in Partnership Dispute. Court holds that findings of fact by arbitrator are not open to reappreciation under Section 34 unless perverse or contrary to public policy.

2 Apr 2026

The appellants, M. Mallikarjuna and Smt. Rajeshwari Mallikarjuna, filed an appeal under Section 37(1)(c) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals Challenging Labour Court's Finding on Majority Union. Membership Verification by Labour Court is Final and Binding on Employer and Rival Union.

30 Nov -0001

The case involves a dispute between two trade unions, Akhil Dadra & Nagar Haveli Kamgar Sangh (appellant in LPA 197/2008) and Krantikari Kamgar Union ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Arbitral Award in Insurance Dispute — Wear and Tear Exclusion Not Applicable to Sudden Breakdown. The court held that the insurer failed to prove that the bearing failure was due to wear and tear, and the breakdown was a fortuitous event covered under the Industrial All Risk Policy.

15 Feb 2019

The petitioner, United Phosphorous Limited, was in the business of pesticides and chemicals. It purchased a Gas Turbine Engine from GE Packaged Power ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal of Retired Employee Against State's Challenge to Lok Nyayalaya Order. The Court held that the Lok Nyayalaya's order directing pensionary benefits was binding and the State could not bypass it by filing a writ petition without exhausting alternative remedies.

7 Mar 2006

The appeal arises from a judgment of a Single Judge of the Bombay High Court allowing a writ petition filed by the State of Maharashtra and the Mahara...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition in Execution Dispute — Quashes Order Dismissing Execution Petition as Not Maintainable. Withdrawal of Earlier Execution Petition Without Liberty Does Not Bar Fresh Execution Under Order XXI Rule 2 CPC.

12 Aug 2020

The writ petition was filed by the judgment-debtors (petitioners) challenging an order dated 19.04.2017 passed by the LII Additional City Civil and Se...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Workmen's Petitions Challenging Denial of Wages Under Section 17B of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 — Closure of Establishment Not a Ground to Deny Wages During Pendency of Employer's Challenge to Reinstatement Award.

30 Nov -0001

The present batch of writ petitions was filed by workmen challenging the order of the Industrial Court, Kolhapur, which while staying the execution of...

High Court

Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Recovery Suit — Plaintiff Fails to Prove Title and Possession. The Court held that the plaintiff, who purchased property from co-owners, cannot recover possession without establishing his title and the defendants' possession as trespassers, and the concurrent findings of fact by lower courts cannot be interfered with under Section 100 CPC.

7 Jan 2025

The appellant/plaintiff filed a suit for recovery of possession and damages against the respondents/defendants 2 and 3 in respect of a property that w...

High Court

Writ petitions before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay challenge orders of the Industrial Court, Solapur, regarding the legality of a strike and allegation of unfair labour practice. The petitions raise the issue whether compliance with Section 24 of the MRTU & PULP Act alone suffices for strike legality when the BIR Act concurrently applies.

7 Jun 2006

The judgment dealt with two writ petitions filed by Vyapari Sahakari Bank Maryadit, a co-operative society, under Article 226 of the Constitution, cha...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Union's Petition in Unfair Labour Practice Case - Layoff and Lockout by Company Held Illegal. Company's Failure to Obtain Permission Under Section 25M of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and Subsequent Lockout Constitute Unfair Labour Practices Under MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.

24 Aug 2006

The Maharashtra General Kamgar Union filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging an order of the Industrial Court dated 30...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Appeals in Industrial Dispute Cases — Workmen Entitled to Reinstatement with Back Wages as Retrenchment Without Compliance with Section 25-F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Was Illegal. The court upheld the Labour Court's finding that retrenchment of workmen who had completed 240 days of service was void for non-compliance with Section 25-F, and reinstatement with full back wages was justified.

30 Nov -0001

The appellant, Godrej Industries Ltd. (formerly Godrej Soaps Ltd.), employed the respondents as workmen. The respondents were retrenched by the appell...

25 26 27 28 29

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)