Search Results for "Appellate authority"

Trending :

Search Results for "Appellate authority"

290 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 290 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Life Ban on Cricketer in BCCI Spot-Fixing Case — Disciplinary Committee's Findings Based on Audio Recordings and Commissioner's Report Upheld. The Court held that the standard of proof in domestic disciplinary proceedings is preponderance of probabilities, and the BCCI's decision was not perverse.

15 Mar 2019

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal filed by cricketer S. Sreesanth challenging the life ban imposed by the Board of Control for Cricket in India (...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Restrains West Bengal Police from Obstructing CBFC-Certified Film Exhibition. State Cannot Act as Super-Censor Over Films Certified Under Cinematograph Act, 1952.

15 Mar 2019

The petitioners, Indibily Creative Pvt Ltd and its directors, produced a Bengali feature film titled 'Bhobishyoter Bhoot' (meaning 'future ghosts'), a...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Land Ceiling Case - Excess Land Vested in State in 1981 Cannot Be Revived. The Court held that the appellants' attempt to revive ceiling proceedings under the U.P. Imposition of Ceiling of Land Holdings Act, 1960 was devoid of merit as the surplus land had already vested in the State.

12 Mar 2019

The appeal arose from land ceiling proceedings under the U.P. Imposition of Ceiling of Land Holdings Act, 1960. The original holder, Ram Bharose Lal, ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Educational Institute in Gratuity Dispute — Teacher Held Entitled to Gratuity Under Amended Definition. The Court applied the retrospective amendment to Section 2(e) of the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972, which included teachers as employees, and upheld the orders of the controlling authority and High Court.

7 Mar 2019

The appeal arose from a dispute between Birla Institute of Technology (BIT) and a retired Assistant Professor (respondent No.4) regarding payment of g...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Institute's Appeal in Gratuity Dispute — Retrospective Amendment Covers Teachers Under Payment of Gratuity Act. Teacher's Claim for Gratuity Upheld as Amended Definition of 'Employee' Includes Teachers with Retrospective Effect from 1997.

7 Mar 2019

The Supreme Court of India dealt with an appeal by Birla Institute of Technology (BIT) against the State of Jharkhand and others, concerning the entit...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Inclusion of Special Allowances in Basic Wages for Provident Fund. The court considered whether special allowances paid by establishments to employees fall within 'basic wages' under Section 2(b)(ii) read with Section 6 of the Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952.

28 Feb 2019

The Supreme Court heard a batch of appeals raising a common question of law: whether special allowances paid by establishments to their employees fall...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Trader's Liability for Excise Duty on Job Work Fabrics Under Rule 12B of Central Excise Rules, 2002. The Court Held That the Trader Who Gets Fabrics Manufactured Through Job Workers Is Deemed Manufacturer and Liable for Duty, Not the Job Worker.

28 Feb 2019

The case involves appeals by Dinesh Textiles, a trader who got cotton fabrics and made-ups manufactured through job workers, against the order of the ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in Urban Land Ceiling Case — Upholds Vesting of Land in State and Rejects Ownership Claim. The Court held that the plaintiffs failed to prove their title and that the suit was barred by res judicata and limitation.

26 Feb 2019

The case involves a dispute over land bearing No.73, Canal Circular Road, Calcutta, which was part of a larger parcel of land. The plaintiffs, claimin...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Buyer's Refund Claim for Excise Duty Paid Under Protest by Manufacturer — Limitation Period Under Section 11B Applies Separately to Buyer. The right of the buyer to claim refund under Section 11B(2)(e) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 is distinct from that of the manufacturer, and the benefit of the second proviso (duty paid under protest) does not extend to the buyer.

20 Feb 2019

The case involves a batch of appeals by Western Coalfields Ltd. (the buyer) against the rejection of its refund claim for central excise duty paid by ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Buyer's Refund Claim for Excise Duty Paid Under Protest by Manufacturer — Limitation Period Under Section 11B(1) Applies Separately to Buyer. The right of the buyer to claim refund under Section 11B(2)(e) is distinct from the manufacturer's right, and the benefit of the second proviso (waiver of limitation for duty paid under protest) does not extend to the buyer.

20 Feb 2019

The Supreme Court dismissed a batch of appeals filed by Western Coalfields Ltd. (the buyer) against the rejection of its refund claim for central exci...

25 26 27 28 29

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)