Search Results for "shortfall"

369 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 369 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Accused in POCSO and IPC Case — Victim's Testimony Found Credible Despite Minor Inconsistencies. Medical Evidence Corroborates Sexual Assault; Extortion and Criminal Intimidation Charges Sustained Under Sections 384 and 506 IPC.

The appellant, Sandip Hariprasad Pande, was convicted by the Special Judge, Nagpur in Special Child Protection Case No.63/2015 for offences under Sect...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Arbitral Award in Guarantee Dispute — Guarantor's Liability Not Discharged by Family Settlement Without Bank's Consent. Family Settlement Between Guarantor and Principal Debtor Does Not Discharge Guarantor Under Section 134 of Indian Contract Act, 1872.

The petitioner, Narinder Pal Agarwal, was a director and guarantor of Narendra Metal Converters Pvt. Ltd., which had taken loans from Saraswat Coopera...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Winding Up Petition Against Listed Company in Reverse Factoring Dispute. Debt disputed in bona fide manner and company is solvent, hence winding up not justified under Sections 433(e) and (f) of Companies Act, 1956.

The petitioner, SBI Global Factors Ltd., a financial institution, filed a winding up petition under Sections 433(e) and (f) read with Sections 434(1)(...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Arbitral Award in Lease Finance Dispute Due to Limitation Bar. Claim for Enhanced Rent Based on Depreciation Disallowance Held Time-Barred Under Article 137 of Limitation Act, 1963.

The petitioner, Aditya Birla Chemicals (India) Ltd., challenged an arbitral award dated 9th August, 2011 under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conci...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Pipeline Construction Dispute. Court upholds arbitrator's findings on breach of contract and quantum of damages, rejecting challenge under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, Mahanagar Gas Ltd., challenged an arbitral award dated 5th March 2010 passed by a sole arbitrator under Section 34 of the Arbitration ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Settlement in Industrial Dispute for Breach of Section 12 of Industrial Disputes Act and Rule 11 of Industrial Disputes (Bombay) Rules. Settlement Dated 5.9.2008 Quashed as Void Ab Initio for Non-Compliance with Mandatory Conciliation Procedure.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions challenging a settlement dated 5.9.2008 arrived at in conciliation between NRC Limited (the company) and NRC ...