Search Results for "share dealing"

2064 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2064 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Land Suit Barred by Limitation. Suit for declaration of title and partition filed after 12 years from date of knowledge of adverse possession held time-barred under Article 65 of Limitation Act, 1963.

The present Second Appeal arises from a judgment and order dated 7th October 1991 of the Additional District Judge, Pune, in Civil Appeal No.265 of 19...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes Human Rights Commission Proceedings in Property Dispute Due to Lack of Jurisdiction. The Commission Exceeded Its Powers Under the Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993 by Intervening in a Private Property Matter with a Pending Civil Suit.

The dispute originated from lands in village Zundal, District Gandhinagar, originally owned by Jethabhai Lallubhai Patel and devolved through inherita...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Petition Under Section 11 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 for Appointment of Arbitrator in Joint Development Agreement Dispute. Memorandum of Agreement dated 14.06.2012 Contains Valid Arbitration Clause.

The petitioners, three individuals, filed a petition under Section 11(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking appointment of a sole ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Adjudicates Writ Petition Challenging Constitutional Validity of Section 88 of Finance Act, 2004. Petitioner, a tyre manufacturer, contended that the cut-off date of 1 April 2000 for utilization of Additional Excise Duty credit is arbitrary and violates Article 14.

The petitioners, CEAT Limited, engaged in the manufacture of tyres, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Seeking Direction to Provide Arbitration in Expired Toll Collection Contracts. Clause 36 of Agreement Held Not an Arbitration Agreement; Court Cannot Direct Parties to Arbitrate Under Article 226.

The Bombay High Court dismissed two writ petitions filed by M/s. MEP RGSL Toll Bridge Pvt. Ltd. and Raima Toll & Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd., both specia...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Demand of VAT on Pan Masala Containing Tobacco under MVAT Act, 2002. Exemption Under Schedule Entry A-45 Upheld and Part Payment Orders Quashed as Explanation Inserted by Notification dated 21.01.2006 Held Ultra Vires.

The dispute arose under the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002 regarding the levy of VAT on pan masala containing tobacco (gutkha/mawa) for the fin...