Search Results for "separate cadre"

303 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 303 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Assistant Professor's Challenge to Superannuation at Age 60, Holds AICTE Retirement Age of 65 Applicable to Private Self-Finance Standalone Institution. Goa Institute of Management's Faculty Manual Fixing Retirement Age at 60 is Overridden by AICTE Regulations.

The petitioner, Dr. Vilasini Devi Nair, was appointed as an Assistant Professor at the Goa Institute of Management (GIM), a private self-finance stand...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition, Directs Issuance of Normal Validity Passport to Accused in Murder Case Despite Pending Trial. Passport Authority Cannot Deny Full Validity Based on Criminal Proceedings Without Specific Legal Bar Under Passports Act, 1967.

The petitioner, Santhosh Beejadi Srinivasa, is an employee working as Senior Manager (Process and Planning) at Mann+Hummel Filter Private Limited, Tum...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Retention and Transfer Orders in BESCOM Employee Dispute — Violation of Natural Justice and Seniority Rights. Petitioner's Transfer and Retention of Junior Colleague Set Aside as Arbitrary and Contrary to Established Service Rules.

The petitioner, Sri D. Naveen, an Assistant Engineer (Electrical) with BESCOM, challenged two orders: (1) Annexure-J dated 12.3.2021, which retained t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Challenge to Promotion of Deputy Director of Health Services — Seniority and Eligibility Criteria Upheld. The court held that the promotion based on seniority-cum-merit was valid and the petitioner failed to establish any arbitrariness or violation of rules.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by Dr. Prakash Nachinolkar and Dr. Ruando E.J. J. De Sa challenging the promotion of Dr. Sanjiv Dalvi a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Writ Petition Challenging Retirement of Operatives Under Wrong Standing Orders — MRTU & PULP Act, 1971. Industrial Court directed to decide whether petitioners are Operatives governed by Standing Order 20-A or non-operatives under Model Standing Orders.

The petitioners, three employees of M/s Kohinoor Mills (a unit of NTC Ltd.), filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging t...