Search Results for "separate business"

4273 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 4273 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Upholds Transfer of Income Tax Cases from Wardha to Jodhpur Under Section 127 of Income Tax Act, 1961 — Transfer Order Valid Despite Alleged Violation of Natural Justice as Assessees Were Given Opportunity of Hearing and Reasons Recorded.

The judgment pertains to two writ petitions filed by assessees challenging the transfer of their income tax cases from Wardha, Maharashtra to Jodhpur,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Injunction in Trademark Infringement Case — 'Cothagiri' Mark Deceptively Similar to 'Cothas'. Defendant restrained from using mark 'cothagiri' for coffee products as it is phonetically and structurally similar to plaintiff's registered trademark 'Cothas'.

The case involves a trademark infringement dispute between two coffee companies. The appellant, M/s Avighna Coffee Pvt. Ltd., was the defendant in the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Arbitration Petition Challenging Arbitral Award on Grounds of Patent Illegality and Public Policy. Court sets aside award for ignoring contractual terms and failing to consider counterclaims.

The judgment concerns two arbitration petitions arising out of the same arbitral award. The petitioners (original respondents) challenged the award un...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Lack of Proper Service of Notice Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. Complainant Failed to Prove That Notice Was Sent to Correct Address of Accused, Leading to Dismissal of Complaint.

The case involves a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, filed by M/s. General Detergents (the appellant/complainant) ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit for Declaration and Injunction in Property Dispute — Plaintiffs Fail to Prove Title and Possession. Court holds that mere possession of property documents does not establish ownership and that plaintiffs must prove their title independently.

The plaintiffs, claiming to be owners and in possession of a plot of land in Ghatkopar, Mumbai, filed a suit for declaration of ownership and permanen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Nagpur Bench Rejects Inquiry Reports of Internal Complaints Committee for Violation of Section 13 of the Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace Act, 2013. Separate Reports by Presiding Officer and Members Held Invalid, and Fresh Inquiry Ordered.

Background: Three female Assistant Professors at Shri Shivaji Science College filed writ petitions challenging their transfer orders dated 25.06.2013,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers GST Liability on Royalty Payments to Court Receiver in Commercial Property Dispute. The Court Examines Whether Payments to a Court Receiver Under Order XL CPC Constitute Taxable Supply Under the CGST Act, 2017 and Whether GST Should be Discharged via Reverse Charge Mechanism.

The Bombay High Court, in a Court Receiver's Report arising from a commercial suit for recovery of possession of three shops used as a restaurant, exa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Public Servants for Lack of Sanction Under Section 197 CrPC. Acts Alleged Were in Discharge of Official Duty, Making Sanction Mandatory; Proceedings Quashed Under Section 482 CrPC.

The judgment involves multiple criminal petitions filed by various individuals, including Mallu S/o Vittal Toravi and others, seeking quashing of crim...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Rent Control Eviction Case, Restoring Trial Court's Order on Unauthorized Subletting. High Court's Revisional Interference Found Impermissible as It Reappreciated Evidence Beyond Jurisdictional Limits Under Section 46 of Karnataka Rent Act, 1999.

The dispute arose from eviction proceedings initiated by the landlord against the tenant, a partnership firm, under the Karnataka Rent Act, 1999. The ...