Search Results for "reverse acquittal"

364 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 364 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Failure to Prove Common Intention. Conviction under Sections 302, 307, 324, 323, 143, 147, 148, 149 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Establish Unlawful Assembly and Overt Acts.

The case involves multiple criminal appeals arising from a conviction by the trial court for offences including murder under Section 302 read with 149...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction of Accused in Abduction and Murder Case Based on Consistent Eyewitness Testimony and Circumstantial Evidence — High Court's Reversal of Acquittal for Two Accused Upheld Due to Common Intention Under Section 34 IPC.

The case pertains to the abduction and murder of Neelam on 30.08.1985. The informant, Ramanand Singh (PW18), lodged an FIR alleging that seven accused...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in NDPS Case: Reversal of Acquittal by High Court Sustained. Commercial Quantity of Charas Recovered from Appellants; Complainant as Investigating Officer Not Per Se Biased.

The case pertains to the conviction of Rajesh Dhiman and Gulshan Rana under Section 20 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (ND...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Dowry Death Case — Prosecution Fails to Prove Demand of Dowry and Harassment. Evidence of Interested Witnesses and Lack of Corroboration Lead to Acquittal Under Sections 304-B, 498-A IPC and Dowry Prohibition Act.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgment and order dated 27.08.2001 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Ahmednagar in Sessions Case...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Misapplication of Section 8 of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 — Charge Framed Under Wrong Provision Invalidates Conviction

The appellant, a Junior Clerk in a Sessions Court, was convicted under Section 8 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 for allegedly demanding and...