Search Results for "raiding party"

392 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 392 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Sanction and Unreliable Trap Witnesses. Conviction under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prior sanction under Section 19 was not obtained and trap witnesses were not independent.

The case involves two appeals against conviction under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The appellants, Dr. Nishikant Bhaskarrao Kulkarni (sinc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Sanction and Unreliable Trap Witnesses. Conviction under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance of bribe beyond reasonable doubt.

The case pertains to an appeal against conviction under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The appellants, Dr. Nishikant Bhaskarrao Kulkarni (sin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal as Abated Due to Death of Appellant in Corruption Case. Appeal Against Conviction Under Prevention of Corruption Act Abates Under Section 394 CrPC as No Legal Heir Can Continue Challenge to Conviction.

The appellant, Vijay Parvatrao Salunkhe, a police constable, was convicted by the trial court for offences under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) read with Sec...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal of Motor Vehicle Inspector in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Section 161 IPC and Section 5(1)(d) read with 5(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1948.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the acquittal of Balchandra Ramdas Jain, a Motor Vehicle Inspector, for offences under Section 161 IPC and S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in CBI Bribery Case Due to Lack of Independent Witnesses and Procedural Lapses. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, Rajesh Mopkar, a clerk in the Income Tax Office, Nagpur, was convicted by the Special Judge, Nagpur, for demanding and accepting a brib...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant in NDPS Case for Possession of 3 kg Heroin — Ten Years' RI and Fine of Rs. 1 Lakh Maintained. Search of Bag Not Personal Search, Hence Section 50 NDPS Act Not Applicable.

The appellant, Vinod Ramchandra Dhakad, was convicted by the learned Special Judge, NDPS Cases, Mumbai, in NDPS Special Case No. 107/2004 for an offen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Acquits Accused in Electricity Theft Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Direct Theft and Procedural Lapses. Theft of Electricity Allegation Fails as Prosecution Did Not Prove That the Accused Was Directly Involved in the Theft or That the Meter Was Tampered With.

The appellant, Bhanudas Supadu Wani, was convicted by the Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge, Dhule, in Special Case No. 11 of 2005 for theft of electric...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, Shabbir Mohamed Ishaque Bagwan, was convicted by the Special Judge, Pune, for offences under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of...