Search Results for "penalty under Excise Rules"

437 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 437 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Madras Disposes of Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging Income Tax and GST Assessment Orders, Suo Motu Impleads State Bank of India. No specific legal finding or ratio is discernible from the available text.

The High Court of Madras heard a batch of writ petitions filed by multiple corporate entities, including Aqua Terra Coke and Energy Limited (formerly ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Appeals of Travel Agencies in Service Tax Export Case — Services Rendered to Foreign Clients Abroad Constitute Export of Service Under Finance Act, 1994. Extended Period of Limitation Under Section 73 of Finance Act, 1994 Cannot Be Invoked Without Suppression or Fraud.

The Madras High Court allowed two appeals filed by M/s. Translanka Air Travels Pvt Ltd and M/s. ETA Travel Agency Pvt Ltd against orders of the Custom...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Customs Department's Reference Application in Export Valuation Case. Tribunal's finding that facts were indistinguishable from precedent upheld, no question of law arises.

The Principal Commissioner of Customs filed a Civil Petition under Section 130A of the Customs Act, 1962, challenging the final order of the Central E...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Reversal of Cenvat Credit Without Goods Entering Factory Premises Invalid: Bombay HC Upholds Recovery and Penalty" "Illegitimate Reversal of Cenvat Credit and Misrepresentation of Goods' Movement Constitutes Fraud"

Acts and Sections Discussed: Central Excise Act, 1944 - Section 35G (Appeal to High Court), Section 11AC (Penalty for Excise Duty Evasion). Cenvat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Validity of Pre-deposit Condition Under Punjab VAT Act. Condition of 25% Pre-deposit for First Appeal Held Not Unconstitutional, but Appellate Authority Has Inherent Power to Grant Interim Relief.

The Supreme Court considered a batch of appeals challenging the judgment of the Punjab and Haryana High Court which upheld the validity of Section 62(...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Manufacturer in Excise Duty Dispute Over Transit Insurance. Insurance cost incurred by manufacturer on behalf of dealer after factory gate sale is not includible in assessable value under Central Excise Act, 1944.

The petitioner, Mercedes Benz India Private Limited, a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, manufactures motor vehicles and parts at it...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Reduces Customs Penalty for Signing Documents in Good Faith — Section 112(a) Customs Act, 1962. Petitioner's limited role and lack of knowledge of illegal importation warranted reduction of penalty from Rs.7.5 lakhs to Rs.1 lakh.

The petitioner, Ashok Chhabildas, a sole proprietor of M/s A.V. Impex, challenged the order of CEGAT dated 19/1/2001 which confirmed the order-in-orig...