WRIT PETITION NO.3508 OF 2024
20 Jun 2025...
Search Results for "leasehold rights"
378 result(s) found
Found 378 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals in Shamlat Deh Land Dispute — Amendment Protection Not Available Without Proof of Allotment to Displaced Person. Land recorded as Shamlat deh in revenue records cannot be excluded from definition under Section 2(g) of Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulation) Act, 1961 unless allotment on quasi-permanent basis to displaced person or transfer by sale before 09.07.1985 is established.
10 Jan 2025The Supreme Court dismissed a batch of Special Leave Petitions challenging orders of eviction from lands claimed to be Shamlat deh under the Punjab Vi...
- 628
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Eviction Decree in Rent Control Suit — Confirms Findings of Subletting and Non-User of Premises. Landlord's Eviction Suit Under Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 Upheld as Tenants Failed to Prove Bona Fide Use and Consent for Subletting.
17 Dec 2024The case arises from a landlord-tenant dispute concerning Shop No.2 and rear portion of Shop No.1 in Supariwala Mansion, Parel, Mumbai. The original p...
- 508
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Section 9 Petition as Misuse of Process in Redevelopment Dispute with Non-Member Occupant. Court holds that a developer cannot seek interim relief against a non-signatory occupant under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, where the occupant has independent rights and is not bound by the arbitration agreement.
30 Sep 2024The petitioner, Gulshan Townplanners LLP, a developer, filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking interim ...
- 841
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Resumption Order and Restores Sanad Holder's Rights in Land Grant Dispute — Lease in Perpetuity Not Extinguished by Expiry of Fifty-Year Revenue Period. The court held that the Sanad was a perpetual lease and that the Collector's order of resumption was based on a misinterpretation of the term of the lease.
25 Jul 2024The dispute concerns a land bearing CTS No. 3762 at Nashik, granted to Ahmedsaheb Kadarsaheb Kokani under a Sanad dated 31st October 1920. The Sanad s...
- 647
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Interim Application for Impleadment in Writ Petition Concerning Demolition of Building — Applicant Claims Ownership of Flat and Seeks to Protect Possession. The court held that the applicant has a direct interest in the property and should be heard before any order affecting his rights is passed.
13 Dec 2023The judgment pertains to an interim application filed by Nagesh Madhava Suvarna seeking impleadment in a pending writ petition. The writ petition was ...
- 52
High Court
Bombay High Court Directs Court Receiver to Evict Third Party from Suit Property in Port Trust Lease Dispute. Third party found in illegal occupation of building without any right, directed to be evicted with police assistance.
5 Jun 2023The Bombay High Court addressed a Court Receiver's Report seeking directions regarding a third party, Mr. Sahebrao Kadam, who was found occupying subs...
- 51
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Tenant's Appeal in SARFAESI Act Case — Oral Tenancy After Mortgage Not Protected. Tenant's claim of tenancy based on oral agreement after mortgage creation cannot defeat bank's right to take possession under Section 14 of SARFAESI Act.
11 Sep 2019The present appeal arises from an order of the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Esplanade, Mumbai, dated 31.12.2014, rejecting the application of the ap...
- 298
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Decree for Possession in Rent Control Suit — Tenant Status Upheld Under Section 7(15)(d) of Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999. The court found sufficient evidence that the respondent was carrying on business with the original tenant at the time of his death, and the concurrent findings on area were not perverse.
22 Jul 2015The petitioners, M/s. Dattakrupa Construction & Anr., filed a civil revision application challenging the orders dated 27 May 2013 and 13 May 2015 pass...
- 121
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Trial Court Order Refusing Deletion of Parties in Suit for Declaration and Injunction — Misjoinder of Parties and Causes of Action Not Established. The court held that the presence of defendants 6 to 8 was necessary for complete adjudication of the dispute relating to partnership property and family settlement under Order I Rule 10 CPC.
25 Oct 2013The petitioners, defendants 1 to 4 in Special Civil Suit No. 2 of 2012, filed a writ petition challenging the trial court's order dated 18 April 2012,...
- 83
