Search Results for "fee default"

466 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 466 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Penetrative Sexual Assault Allegation Fails as Victim's Statements to Doctor and Magistrate Did Not Mention Digital Penetration, and Material Evidence Like Knickers Was Not Produced.

The appellant, Chatur @ Chetan Maroti Meshram, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Gadchiroli, for offences under Section 376-AB IPC and S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Lack of Corroborative Evidence and Medical Inconsistencies. Conviction under Section 6 of POCSO Act and Section 376(2)(i) IPC set aside as victim's testimony was tutored and medical evidence showed no injury.

The appellant, Kisan Harinkhede, was convicted by the Special Judge, Gondia, for offences under Section 376(2)(i) IPC and Section 6 of the POCSO Act f...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Recovery Suit, Sets Aside Decree Due to Non-Production of Best Evidence. Adverse Inference Drawn Under Section 114(g) of Indian Evidence Act, 1872 Against Plaintiff Who Failed to Produce Written Agreement and Delivery Challans.

The appellant, Karnataka State Agro Corn Products Ltd., a Government of Karnataka undertaking, was the defendant in a suit for recovery of money filed...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Against Demolition of Dilapidated Chawl for Non-Compliance with Interim Orders. Petitioners Failed to Provide Structural Stability Certificate and Alternative Accommodation as Directed, Leading to Dismissal of Writ Petition Under Article 226.

The petitioners, five individuals residing in a chawl in Dahisar, Mumbai, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition to Remove Arbitrator in Arbitration Dispute. Relationship Between Arbitrator and Law Firm Representing Party Does Not Automatically Disqualify Under Section 12(5) of Arbitration Act.

The petitioner, Sheetal Maruti Kurundwade, filed a petition under Section 9 and Sections 12(3) and 12(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996...