Search Results for "employee gratuity"

729 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 729 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Allows Compassionate Pension Claim of Compulsorily Retired Employee Under Gujarat Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 2002. Rejection of Compassionate Pension Solely on Ground of Serious Punishment Quashed for Non-Application of Mind.

The petitioner, Hitesh Balvantrai Kothari, was a government employee who was compulsorily retired from service on 26 August 2010 as a disciplinary pun...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Termination of Employees of National Textile Corporation Ltd. — Petitioners Not Employees of NTC Ltd. as They Were Appointed by Contractors and No Employer-Employee Relationship Established.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by Shilpa S. Chandankar and Priyanka Pradeep Chavan against the National Textile Corporation Ltd. (NTC ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

WRIT PETITION NO.2063 OF 2025

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses State's Appeal Against Pension Grant to Scheme Employees Under Uttar Pradesh Cane Service Rules. Employees of Antar Gramin Sadak Nirman Yojana Held Entitled to Pension and Retiral Benefits as Per Government Decisions and Precedent in Vinod Kumar Goel.

The appeal arose from a judgment of the Allahabad High Court (Lucknow Bench) dated 18.05.2016, which held that employees appointed under the Antar Gra...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Retired Professor's Petition, Quashes Recovery from Gratuity and Pension. Recovery of Rs.8,43,782/- from retiral benefits set aside as employer failed to prove misrepresentation or fraud by employee, and recovery from pension/gratuity is impermissible under settled law.

The petitioner, Ganesh Sitaram Magar, a retired Ayurved professor, challenged the recovery of Rs.8,43,782/- from his gratuity and pension benefits. He...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Challenging Reinstatement Order in Unfair Labour Practice Case. Employer failed to prove voluntary resignation through E-portal; reinstatement with full back wages upheld under MRTU & PULP Act.

The Petitioner, Reliance Integrated Services Pvt. Ltd., challenged the orders of the Labour Court and Industrial Court directing reinstatement of the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Challenge to Labour Court Awards in Milk Union Retrenchment Cases. Retrenchment of Daily Wagers Without Compliance with Section 25-F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Held Illegal.

The petitioner, Solapur Zilla Sahakari Dudh Utpadak Sangh, a cooperative milk union, challenged multiple awards passed by the Labour Court, Solapur, i...