Search Results for "capital asset"

575 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 575 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Hindalco Industries Tax Case on Section 80HHC Deduction and Capital vs Revenue Expenditure. Tribunal's findings on exclusion of local turnover for export deduction and treatment of financial advisory fees as revenue expenditure upheld.

The appeal was filed by the Commissioner of Income Tax-6 against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) dated 28.11.2008 in ITA No.3668...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revision Against Rejection of Leave to Defend in Summary Suit. Bank Granted Conditional Leave to Defend on Deposit of Rs. 25 Lakhs for Triable Issues Regarding Liability as Mortgagee in Possession Under Order 37 CPC.

The case involves a Civil Revision Application filed by ICICI Bank Limited (the applicant/original defendant No.1) against the order dated 30th June 2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition of Charitable Trust Against Rejection of Condonation of Delay in Filing Form 9A Under Section 119(2)(b) of Income Tax Act, 1961. CBDT Circulars Must Be Liberally Construed to Grant Relief When Delay Is Due to Change in Procedure from Manual to Electronic Filing.

The petitioner, Nav Chetna Charitable Trust, is a trust registered under Section 12A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, and runs educational institutions. F...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Invalidity of Partnership Between HUF Karta and Its Member in Income Tax Registration Case. Partnership Deed Between Karta and Coparcener of Same HUF Held Void as No Valid Contract Possible Under Section 4 of Indian Partnership Act, 1932.

The case pertains to an Income Tax Reference under Section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, arising from the order of the Income Tax Appellate Trib...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Winding-Up Order in Bond Default Case; Upholds Adverse Remarks Against Directors for Fund Diversion. Company Found Unable to Pay Debts and Substratum Lost, Justifying Winding Up Under Sections 433(e) and 433(f) of Companies Act, 1956.

The appeal arose from a winding-up order passed by the learned company Judge against Zenith Infotech Limited (the appellant) in a petition filed by Th...