Search Results for "ascertained liability"

830 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 830 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against High Court Quashing of Tax Assessment in Inter-State Gas Sale Dispute. State Imposed Tax on Sale of Natural Gas Extracted Under Production Sharing Contract, High Court Quashed Assessment and Directed Refund.

The Supreme Court of India heard a group of civil appeals filed by the State of Uttar Pradesh against the judgment of the Allahabad High Court, Luckno...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Challenging Sanction and Cognizance in UAPA Case — No Infirmity Found in Sanction Order or Cognizance Order. Court upholds validity of suo-motu sanction under Section 45(2) of UAPA and cognizance order under Section 120B IPC read with UAPA and CLA Act.

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal filed by Fuleshwar Gope challenging the judgment of the Jharkhand High Court which refused to quash the sanctio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Manufacturer in Central Excise Duty Dispute on Captive Consumption of Yarn. Court Holds That Bank Guarantees Furnished Under Interim Order Can Be Enforced Without Section 11A Notice.

The appellant, M/s. The Bombay Dyeing & Mfg. Co. Ltd., was engaged in the manufacture of cotton and manmade fabrics. It claimed that the fabric manufa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka considers power of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal to direct fresh enquiry under Section 254 of Income Tax Act, 1961 in a buy-back taxation case. The court formulates the substantial question of law regarding suo motu directions leading to potential enhancement of tax liability.

The appeal before the High Court of Karnataka arose from an order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) concerning the tax treatment of a buy-ba...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Writ Petitions Challenging Government Order Appointing Administrator for Vyasaraja Mutt. Petitioners Allege That the Karnataka Hindu Religious Institutions and Charitable Endowments Act, 1997 Does Not Apply to the Mutt and Seek Quashing of the Administrator's Appointment.

The case involved two writ petitions filed in the High Court of Karnataka challenging the Government orders dated 26.05.2012 appointing an administrat...