Search Results for "Separate assessment"

2015 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2015 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Validates Sub-Classification of Scheduled Castes in Landmark Judgment. Upholding Equality Within Equality: Supreme Court Endorses State's Power to Sub-Classify Scheduled Castes for Targeted Reservation.

The Supreme Court of India, in a significant ruling, has upheld the constitutionality of sub-classifying Scheduled Castes for the purpose of reservati...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds High Court in Capital Gains Tax Case — Accrual Occurs on Date of Award, Not Notification. Transfer of Capital Asset Under Section 45 of Income-tax Act, 1961 Is Complete Only When Compensation Is Determined by Collector's Award, Even if Possession Taken Earlier.

The case concerns the assessment year 1971-1972 for the assessee Amrik Singh HUF, whose land was acquired by the Haryana Government for a college play...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Examines Appeals Concerning Kudankulam Nuclear Power Plant, Addressing Safety and Regulatory Measures Under Atomic Energy Act, 1962. The Court Deliberates on Balancing National Energy Policy with Public Apprehensions Stemming from Past Nuclear Incidents.

The case centers on appeals related to the establishment of a nuclear power plant at Kudankulam in Tamil Nadu. The judgment begins by acknowledging th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates TDS Obligations of Turf Clubs on Stake Money Payments to Horse Owners under Income Tax Act. Interpretation of Section 194B and CBDT Circulars Central to Dispute over Characterization of Stake Money as Winnings.

The case involved writ petitions filed by Bangalore Turf Club Limited, Mysore Race Club Limited, Karnataka Race Horse Owners Association, and an indiv...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of Time Limit for Availing Input Tax Credit Under Section 16(4) of CGST Act. The court held that the time limit is mandatory and not directory, and retrospective amendments are valid.

The Bombay High Court, in a batch of writ petitions, addressed the constitutional validity and interpretation of Section 16(4) of the Central Goods an...