Search Results for "Section 30(1)"

682 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 682 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Show Cause Notice Under Tamil Nadu Protection of Tanks Act — Petitioner Directed to Submit Explanation Before Authorities. Writ Against Show Cause Notice Not Entertainable; Authorities Must Adjudicate After Hearing Alleged Encroacher.

The petitioner, Felix Edward R, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madras High Court challenging a show c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Eviction Notice for Water Body Encroachment — Show Cause Notice Not Justiciable at Preliminary Stage. Authorities Directed to Conclude Enforcement Action Within Twelve Weeks Under Tamil Nadu Protection of Tanks and Eviction Act, 2007.

The petitioner, Balasubramaniyam S, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madras High Court challenging a sh...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Allows Recreation Club's Petition Declaring No License Required for Playing Skill Games. Rummy and other skill games are not gambling, and clubs do not need a license under the Licensing and Controlling of Places of Public Amusement Order.

The petitioner, Sri Siragalli Lakshmidevi Recreation Club (R), a society registered under the Karnataka Societies Registration Act, 1960, filed a writ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Awards Compensation for Illegal Detention of 36 Days as Convict Despite Suspension of Sentence. Petitioner's sentence was suspended by Supreme Court but jail authorities failed to release her, leading to violation of fundamental rights under Article 21.

The petitioner, Imtiyajbi w/o Akbar Shah, a 70-year-old woman, was convicted in Sessions Case No.301/2000 by the Additional Sessions Judge, Aurangabad...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partly Allows Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Reduces Compensation Due to Contributory Negligence. Deceased driver found 50% contributorily negligent in head-on collision; insurer's liability limited to 50% of awarded amount under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The case arises from a motor accident on 25.12.1989 on National Highway No.7 near Kondhali, Nagpur, involving a collision between two trucks: one bear...