Search Results for "Preventive Detention Act"

919 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 919 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Writ Petition Against Preventive Detention Order Under Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1981. Challenge Centers on Whether Non-Literal Translation of Right to Representation in Marathi Vitiates Detention Under Article 22(5) of Constitution.

The matter arose from a criminal writ petition filed by the detenu under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the order of preventive ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Supply of Vital Documents — Failure to Furnish In-Camera Statements and Documents Violates Article 22(5) of Constitution and Section 8 of MPDA Act.

The petitioner, Hanuman Rajaram Mhatre, was detained under an order dated 6th September 2017 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Thane, under Sectio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Violation of Detenu's Right to Lead Oral Evidence Before Advisory Board. Failure to Inform Detenu of Right to Produce Witnesses Renders Detention Invalid.

The petitioner, wife of the detenu Vishal Salunke, challenged the detention order dated 9th August 2017 passed under Section 3 of the Maharashtra Prev...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under COFEPOSA Due to Unexplained Delay. Delay of 9 months and 21 days between arrest and detention order held to be fatal, vitiating the subjective satisfaction of the detaining authority under Section 3(1) of COFEPOSA.

The petitioner, wife of the detenu, filed a writ petition challenging the detention order dated 13.06.2012 issued under Section 3(1) of the Conservati...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Detention Order in Habeas Corpus Petition for Non-Compliance with Procedural Safeguards Under Karnataka Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1985. Failure to Communicate Grounds of Detention in Language Known to Detenue Renders Detention Unlawful.

The petitioner, Dil Shad, wife of Huseen Kabeer, filed a habeas corpus petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order in COFEPOSA Case Due to Non-Application of Mind and Non-Supply of Documents. Nephew of detenu successfully challenged preventive detention order under Section 3(1) of COFEPOSA on grounds of procedural irregularities and lack of material evidence.

The petitioner, nephew of the detenu Salma Karolia, challenged a detention order dated 30th September 2014 issued under Section 3(1) of the Conservati...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under COFEPOSA for Non-Supply of Hindi Translation of Documents to Detenu Not Conversant with English. Failure to Provide Translated Copies of Material Documents Violates Article 22(5) of Constitution and Section 3(1) of COFEPOSA Act, 1974.

The petitioner, Pradeep Panchal, son of the detenu Brahmpal Panchal, filed a criminal writ petition challenging the detention order dated 7 February 2...