Search Results for "Prevention of Corruption Act"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Prevention of Corruption Act"

461 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 461 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Sanction for Prosecution Under Prevention of Corruption Act — Sanction Order Not Required to Be a Speaking Order. Court held that the sanction order under Section 19 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 need not contain detailed reasons and can be based on material placed before the sanctioning authority.

12 Jul 2018

The petitioner, Nandlal Chaturvedi, filed a criminal writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 29th Jan...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Police Hawaldar in Corruption Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Procedural Lapses. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

18 Apr 2018

The appellant, a Police Hawaldar, was convicted by the Special Judge, Karad for demanding and accepting a bribe of Rs. 1000 from the complainant to av...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Public Servants in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as demand and acceptance of bribe not proved beyond reasonable doubt.

5 Mar 2018

The case involves two appeals against a conviction under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The appellants, Kashinath Vikramji Thorat (accused No...

High Court

High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as demand and acceptance of bribe not proved beyond reasonable doubt.

1 Mar 2018

The appellant, Uttam Ramaji Shere, was a public servant working with the Mahatma Fule Backward Development Corporation, Akola. He was convicted by the...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against Quality Control Inspector in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Sanction Under Section 19 of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The court held that sanction is mandatory for prosecution of a public servant and quashed the FIR as the alleged demand was in discharge of official duty.

1 Mar 2018

The applicant, Satish Balasaheb Kelgandre, was serving as a Quality Control Inspector in the office of the District Superintendent of Agricultural, Ah...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Public Servant in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as sole trap witness was interested and testimony suffered from material contradictions.

11 Jan 2018

The appellant, Dattatraya Bhagwan Omase, a public servant working as a Junior Engineer with the Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Lim...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Pardon Granted to Co-Accused in Corruption Case for Non-Compliance with Section 307 CrPC. Pardon Order Set Aside as Special Court Failed to Record Reasons and Did Not Follow Mandatory Procedure Under Section 307 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

21 Dec 2017

The applicant, Nanak Waswani (Accused No.1), and non-applicant No.2, Suresh Chichghare (Accused No.2), were facing trial for offences under the Preven...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Partial Rejection of Discharge in Corruption Case — Sanction Required for Substantive Offences Under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of PC Act but Not for Abetment Under Section 12. The court held that Section 19 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 does not require sanction for taking cognizance of the offence under Section 12 (abetment), and the trial court correctly rejected the discharge application for that offence.

9 Oct 2017

The revision petition was filed by Pravinkumar Pitambar Deore, original accused no.1, challenging the order dated 17 May 2017 passed by the learned Sp...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Patwari in Bribery Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Contradictory Evidence. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) Read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

7 Sep 2017

The appellant, Dattatraya Udaji Warkad, a Patwari, was convicted by the Special Court, Buldhana, for offences under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) read with 13(...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against Quashing of FIR in Corruption Case — High Court's Premature Appreciation of Evidence Set Aside. The Court held that quashing an FIR under Section 482 CrPC based on lack of direct evidence and departmental exoneration, without considering investigation material, is legally unsustainable.

23 Apr 2024

The appeal arose from a judgment of the Karnataka High Court quashing an FIR registered under Section 7(a) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. ...

24 25 26 27 28

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)