Search Results for "NDPS Court"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Compulsory Retirement Case Based on Declining ...
Supreme Court Upholds High Court's Determination that Non-Signatory to MoS Not B...

Search Results for "NDPS Court"

511 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 511 result(s)

High Court

High Court Acquits Accused in NDPS Act Case Due to Insufficient Evidence Linking Him to Cannabis Cultivation. Prosecution Failed to Prove Beyond Reasonable Doubt That Accused Was Cultivator Where Land Had Multiple Occupiers and Investigation Did Not Verify Specific Cultivation, Under Section 20(a)(i) of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985.

7 Mar 2026

The appeal arose from a conviction under Section 20(a)(i) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, where the appellant was sentenc...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Grants Bail to Foreign National in Fake Currency and UAP Act Case — Long Incarceration Without Trial Progress Warrants Release. Prolonged detention of over nine years without significant trial progress violates right to speedy trial under Article 21 of the Constitution, outweighing the risk of absconding by a foreign national.

3 Jul 2024

The appellant, Sheikh Javed Iqbal @ Ashfaq Ansari @ Javed Ansari, a Nepalese national, was arrested on 23.02.2015 after fake Indian currency notes wor...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Sets Aside Bail Order in NDPS Case Due to Failure to Apply Mandatory Twin Conditions Under Section 37. High Court Erred in Granting Bail to Alleged Kingpin Without Recording Satisfaction That Accused Not Guilty and Not Likely to Commit Offence While on Bail, Contrary to Section 37 of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985.

28 Mar 2023

The Supreme Court heard an appeal by the Union of India against the Allahabad High Court's order granting bail to the respondent-accused in a case und...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in NDPS Case Due to Quantity Below Commercial Threshold. Appellant's Sentence Reduced from 10 to 6 Years for Possession of 6.300 kg Ganja Under Section 8(c) and 20(b) of NDPS Act.

3 Dec 2020

The appellant, Issak Nabab Shah, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Kopargaon, for offences under Section 8(c) and 20(b) of the Narcotic ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Acquits Appellant in NDPS Act Case Due to Contradictory Evidence and Non-Production of Contraband. Benefit of Doubt Granted as Prosecution Failed to Establish Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

2 Mar 2020

The appellant was convicted under Section 18 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act) for possession of 6 kg 300 g of op...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Notification Denying Furlough to Convicts Under Section 364 IPC — Rule 4(13) of Furlough and Parole Rules Held Ultra Vires. The Court held that the classification of convicts under Section 364 IPC as ineligible for furlough is arbitrary and violative of Article 14 of the Constitution.

5 May 2016

The petitioner, Santosh Namdeo Bhukan, was convicted under Sections 364, 302, and 201 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) by the Additional Sessions Judge,...

High Court

Bombay High Court Strikes Down Sub-Rule 13 of Furlough Rules as Ultra Vires and Discriminatory — Convicts Convicted for Kidnapping Cannot Be Blanketly Denied Furlough. Sub-rule 13 of Rule 4 of the Maharashtra Prisons (Furlough and Parole) Rules, 1959, which excluded prisoners convicted for kidnapping from furlough, held arbitrary and violative of Article 14 of the Constitution.

28 Apr 2016

The petitioner, Sharad Devaram Shelake, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Pune under Sections 302 and 364 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC)...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Challenge to SAFEMA Forfeiture Order — Agricultural Land Acquired Prior to Detention Exempt from Forfeiture. Property acquired before the 'illegal' period under Section 2(2)(b) of SAFEMA cannot be forfeited; appellate authority's order partly confirmed.

27 Feb 2012

The petitioner, Ranchhodbhai Bhagwanbhai Tandel (since deceased, through his legal heir Naresh Ranchhodbhai Tandel), filed a criminal writ petition un...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Release of Vehicle Seized in NDPS Case to Owner on Supurdnama — Vehicle Not Liable to Confiscation Without Conviction. The Court held that the NDPS Act does not bar release of a vehicle pending trial, and the Sessions Court erred in rejecting the application for interim custody.

27 Jul 2010

The petitioner, Anil Navnath Marathe, was the owner of a Mahindra Max Jeep bearing registration No. MH-12-EF-5860. He was also accused no. 2 in NDPS (...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Sections 42 and 50 of NDPS Act, 1985. Failure to Record Reasons for Search and Non-Communication of Right to be Searched Before Gazetted Officer or Magistrate Renders Conviction Unsustainable.

31 Aug 2006

The appellant, Dinesh Palyekar, was convicted by the Special Judge, Goa, under Section 20(b)(ii)(B) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances ...

24 25 26 27 28

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)