Search Results for "Magistrate's permission"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Magistrate's permission"

1801 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1801 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of Section 6A of the Citizenship Act, 1955 in Assam Accord Challenge — Majority Holds Cut-off Date of 25.03.1971 for Regularisation of Immigrants Valid. The court held that the provision is a reasonable classification under Article 14 and does not violate Articles 6, 7, 29, 325, 326, 355, 356, or 368 of the Constitution.

17 Mar 2025

The Supreme Court, in a batch of petitions and appeals, considered the constitutional validity of Section 6A of the Citizenship Act, 1955, which was i...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Hears Appeal Against Conviction Under Section 302 IPC for Murder of Grandmother. Appellant Contends That the Accused Suffered from Insanity and the Trial Court Failed to Examine a Psychiatrist Under Sections 328 and 329 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

14 Aug 2015

This criminal appeal arose from the conviction of the appellant under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code for the murder of his 85-year-old grandmoth...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows CBI Appeal in Disproportionate Assets Case — Further Investigation Under Section 173(8) CrPC Permitted Despite Earlier Closure Report. The Court held that the Special Court could take cognizance on a charge sheet filed after further investigation under Section 173(8) CrPC even if a closure report under Section 173(2) CrPC had been previously accepted.

28 Apr 2023

The case involves appeals by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) against a High Court order quashing the prosecution of D. Dwarakanadha Reddy (A...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit for Specific Performance of Agreement for Sale of Shop Due to Failure to Prove Valid and Concluded Contract. Plaintiff failed to establish that the agreement was final and binding, and the suit was barred by limitation.

20 Apr 2005

The plaintiff, Shriram Gangaram Gupta, filed a suit in 1980 seeking a declaration that there was a valid and concluded agreement with Defendants Nos. ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds High Court's Quashing of FIR in Property Dispute Except for Extortion Allegations. The Court affirmed that allegations involving execution of powers of attorney and settlement deeds were civil in nature and did not constitute criminal offences under Sections 465, 467, 468, and 120B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, while allowing investigation under Section 385 IPC for extortion demands.

12 Nov 2021

The Supreme Court dealt with appeals arising from a High Court judgment that quashed an FIR under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973,...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Examines Legality of Arrests by Enforcement Directorate in Money Laundering Case After Predicate Offence Closed. Petitioners Allege Violation of Section 19 of PMLA and Fundamental Rights, Challenging Custody Remand Orders.

16 Jun 2026

The three writ petitions, heard together, challenged the legality of the arrest and subsequent custody remand orders of the petitioners, who were dire...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka [Outcome Not Available] in Criminal Petition to Quash FIR Under Sections 406, 417, 418, 420, 465 Indian Penal Code, Involving Joint Development Agreement Dispute. Court Examined Whether Allegations Constituted Criminal Offences or Mere Civil Breach, Emphasizing Need for Dishonest Intention at Inception for Cheating.

3 Feb 2020

The matter involved a criminal petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking to quash FIR No. 168/2018 registered at Hig...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Section 52A and Unreliable Evidence. Conviction under Section 8(b) read with Section 15(c) of NDPS Act set aside as prosecution failed to prove contraband identity and sampling procedure.

1 Jan 2023

The appellant, Mangilal, was convicted under Section 8(b) read with Section 15(c) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Ac...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Holding That Bail in Original FIR Does Not Cover Newly Added UAPA Offences and NIA Re-Registration Is Not a Second FIR. The court ruled that the appellant must seek fresh bail for offences under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967, and that the NIA's re-registration and further investigation were lawful.

26 Apr 2019

The appellant, Pradeep Ram, was initially arrested in connection with FIR No. 02/2016 registered at Police Station Tandwa for offences under Sections ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Examines Constitutionality of National Investigation Agency Act, 2008, in Malegaon Blast Case. Petitioners Challenged Legislative Competence and Transfer of Investigation Without State Consent, Arguing Encroachment on State Police Powers.

11 Oct 2013

The matter arose from two criminal writ petitions filed in the Bombay High Court challenging the constitutional validity of the National Investigation...

24 25 26 27 28

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)