Search Results for "Joint decree"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Joint decree"

2759 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2759 result(s)

High Court

High Court Partly Allows Appeals of Trustees Not Impleaded in Removal Proceedings Under Maharashtra Public Trusts Act — Indirect Removal Without Hearing Violates Natural Justice. Relief Granted to Three Trustees Who Were Not Parties to Original Application Despite Seeking Intervention, Setting Aside Orders Qua Them for Fair Hearing.

14 Jun 2017

The case involved a cluster of first appeals and a writ petition arising from proceedings under the Maharashtra Public Trusts Act, 1950 concerning the...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction, hears a company petition for winding up of Videocon Industries Limited under sections 433(e) and 434(1)(a) read with 439 of the Companies Act, 1956. The petition, filed by an Italian bank, alleges non-payment of Euros 38 million under a Patronage Letter, which the petitioner argues is a guarantee for a loan to a step-down subsidiary.

5 Dec 2013

The petition, Company Petition No. 528 of 2012, was filed by Intesa Sanpaolo S.P.A., an Italian bank, seeking the winding up of Videocon Industries Li...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Demolition Order Against Partnership Firm in BBMP Property Dispute — Lack of Proper Notice and Violation of Natural Justice. Demolition of Building Without Giving Opportunity of Hearing Held Illegal Under Karnataka Municipal Corporations Act, 1976.

6 Sep 2017

The petitioners, M/s. Raghava Reddy and Associates, a partnership firm, along with its partners, filed writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of th...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Possession Suit, Confirms Concurrent Findings on Limitation and Valuation. Article 65 of Limitation Act, 1963 applies to suit for possession based on title, and valuation under Section 14(1) of Maharashtra Court Fees Act, 1959 is not a jurisdictional issue.

15 Dec 2016

The appellant, original defendant, filed a second appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging the concurrent judgments ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Civil Revision Petition for Abatement Due to Failure to Implead Legal Representatives of Deceased Respondent. Delay of 5637 days in seeking substitution not condoned as no sufficient cause shown, resulting in abatement of appeal against deceased respondent.

27 Jan 2025

The petitioner, Sri K.K. Monnappa, filed a civil revision petition under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging an order dated ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Revision Application in Civil Suit — Upholds Right of Heirs to Seek Impleadment Under Order 22 Rule 4 CPC. Court holds that abatement of suit against deceased defendant does not automatically bar substitution of legal representatives if application is made within limitation.

31 Oct 2014

The case arises from a civil suit filed by the respondents (original plaintiffs) against several defendants, including Balbhim Govind Deshpande (origi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Writ Petition Against IGST Demand of Rs.1524 Crores on Arbitration Award Damages. Issue Pertains to Whether Damages Paid Under Deemed Decree Constitute Consideration for Taxable Service Under IGST Act, 2017.

30 Apr 2026

The dispute centers on a writ petition filed by Tata Sons Private Limited (Tata) under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, challenging an intima...

High Court

High Court Hears Civil Revision Applications Against Appellate Order Upholding Obstructionist Right to Occupy Shops on Leased Land. Eviction Decree Against Tenants Did Not Automatically Extinguish Obstructionists' Possession Under Bombay Rent Act and Maharashtra Rent Control Act.

6 Apr 2026

These Civil Revision Applications were filed under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 challenging the common judgment and order dated 4 ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Property Partition Suit — Reverses Concurrent Findings of Courts Below. Dispute over ancestral property and limitation period under Article 65 of Limitation Act, 1963 — Held that the suit for partition was not barred by limitation as the appellant's possession was not adverse.

8 Sep 2025

The present second appeal arises from a suit for partition and separate possession filed by the appellants, Mahadeo Sitaram Navale and Chaturabai Maha...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Tenant's Petition Against Eviction in Rent Control Dispute — Subletting and Unauthorized Occupation Established. Tenant failed to prove lawful succession or consent of landlord for occupation by cousin, leading to eviction under Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947.

3 Jan 2020

The petition was filed by Vasant Sadashiv Joshi (petitioner no.1) and his family members, who were original defendant no.2 in a suit for eviction file...

24 25 26 27 28

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)