Search Results for "Government Lawyers"

463 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 463 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition, Sets Aside Adjudication Orders for Breach of Natural Justice. Non-Compliance with Tribunal's Remand Directions on Disclosure of Test Reports Amounts to Denial of Fair Hearing Under Article 226 of the Constitution.

The writ petition under Article 226 arose from a dispute over the classification of a product known as 'CHOCOS' manufactured by Kellogg India Private ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Pharmacy Council of India's Exclusive Jurisdiction Over Pharmacy Education, Overriding AICTE. The Pharmacy Act, 1948 is a complete code, and the word 'pharmacy' in Section 2(g) of the AICTE Act must be read down to exclude AICTE's regulatory power.

The Supreme Court adjudicated a batch of cases concerning the regulatory authority over pharmacy education in India. The dispute arose when the Pharma...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Quashing Reservation Condition in Development Permission Dispute. MHADA Housing Reservation Deleted by Sanctioned Modification to Development Plan, Municipal Corporation Cannot Insist on Compliance.

The petitioner, Cosmos Constructions, a partnership firm, owned land at Chitalsar, Manpada, Thane. The Thane Municipal Corporation (TMC) imposed Condi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Validity of Secret Ballot Method for Ascertaining Trade Union Majority at Mormugao Port Trust. Petitioner Union Argued That Check-Off System Under Major Port Trusts Act, 1963 and Code of Discipline Should Prevail.

The writ petition was filed under Article 226 of the Constitution by the Mormugao Port and Railway Workers' Union, a trade union registered under the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Notification Declaring PFI Unlawful with Immediate Effect under Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967. Court Holds That Reasons for Immediate Effect are Sufficiently Disclosed in Notification Itself as Required by Section 3(3) Proviso.

The petitioner, claiming to be the President of Popular Front of India (PFI), filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution before the H...