Search Results for "Finance Act 1956"

1227 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1227 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 9 Arbitration Petition Against Guarantors Due to Lack of Privity of Contract. Guarantee Deed Not Signed by Petitioner, No Arbitration Agreement Between Petitioner and Respondents.

The petitioner, L&T Finance Limited, filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking interim relief against the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Stay Application in Arbitration Matter — Consent Order Not Stayed as No Prima Facie Case Made Out. Court held that a consent order passed under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 cannot be stayed unless fraud or lack of jurisdiction is shown.

The petitioner, Tata Capital Financial Services Limited, a non-banking finance company, had sanctioned an invoice discounting facility of Rs. 20,00,00...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging Land Acquisition Notifications for Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout. Petitioners Seek Quashing of Preliminary and Final Notifications Issued Under the BDA Act and the Land Acquisition Act.

A batch of writ petitions filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India came before the High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore, presided...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Uttar Pradesh Board of Madarsa Education Act, 2004 as Valid Regulatory Legislation. High Court erred in striking down entire Act; provisions conflicting with UGC Act are severable.

The Supreme Court considered appeals against the Allahabad High Court's judgment striking down the Uttar Pradesh Board of Madarsa Education Act, 2004 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Overrules Res Judicata Objection in Admiralty Limitation Suit; Prior Withdrawal of Application Before Chinese Court Does Not Bar Fresh Suit Under Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

The dispute arose from a voyage of the vessel M.V. YURIY ARSHENEVSKIY, owned by Murmansk Shipping Company, a Russian entity, which was chartered to ca...