Search Results for "Bangalore Water Supply"

339 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 339 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revenue Appeal in Part on Mutuality Principle for Effluent Treatment Association. Interest on Bank Deposits Held Taxable as Income from Investments, Not Covered by Mutuality.

The case involves an appeal by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against a decision of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal for ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Builder's Challenge to Demolition Notice for Unauthorized Construction in Chennai. Court Holds Regularization is Not an Absolute Right; Unauthorized Commercial Floors Constructed Beyond Approved Plan Must Be Demolished Under Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning Act.

The petitioner, a construction company, challenged a removal notice issued by the Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority (CMDA) dated 28.11.2023, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Presidential Reference Made to Supreme Court Seeks Advisory Opinion on Telecom Licences and Spectrum Allocation Policies. Reference Under Article 143(1) Recites Historical Grant of Licences from 1994 to 2008 Including First-Come-First-Served and Revenue Share Regimes.

Background: The President of India made a reference under Article 143(1) of the Constitution on 12.04.2012, seeking the advisory opinion of the Suprem...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Reinstatement of Anganwadi Sevika with Full Back Wages in Termination Dispute. Industrial Court's Revision Order Restoring Continuity and Back Wages Upheld as Termination Found Unjustified Under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

The petitioners, the Zilla Parishad and the Child Development Project Officer, challenged the judgment of the Industrial Court dated 17/09/2013 in Rev...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of Time Limit for Availing Input Tax Credit Under Section 16(4) of CGST Act. The court held that the time limit is mandatory and not directory, and retrospective amendments are valid.

The Bombay High Court, in a batch of writ petitions, addressed the constitutional validity and interpretation of Section 16(4) of the Central Goods an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

(SLP (C) No.28644 of 2019)

Background: The case involves a service dispute where an Executive Engineer (Civil) with the North Delhi Municipal Corporation was dismissed from serv...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

WRIT PETITION NO.6789 OF 2016

...