Search Results for "Attesting Witness"

351 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 351 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findings Upheld. Sale Deed Cancelled to Extent of Plaintiff's 1/4th Share as Purchaser Not a Bonafide Transferee Without Notice.

The present second appeal was filed by the original defendant No.4, Vikrant s/o Vilasrao Patil (since deceased, through legal heirs), challenging the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Robbery Case Due to Unreliable Disclosure Statement and Lack of Corroborative Evidence. Conviction under Sections 392 and 397 IPC Set Aside as Recovery of Common Articles and Hostile Witnesses Failed to Establish Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appeal arose from a robbery case where the appellant was convicted under Sections 392 and 397 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) by the Trial Co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Dacoity Case Due to Lack of Identification and Flawed Circumstantial Evidence. High Court's Reversal of Acquittal Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Identity and Circumstantial Evidence Was Unreliable Under Section 397 IPC.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal of Nagaraja (Accused No.4) against the judgment of the Karnataka High Court which had reversed his acquittal and ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal by MIDC in Land Acquisition Compensation Case Due to Lack of Evidence. Reference Court's enhancement of compensation to Rs.40,000 per acre set aside as it relied on unproven sale deeds and failed to consider the land's quality and location.

The case involves a land acquisition dispute where the Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation (MIDC) acquired land belonging to respondent no....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Agreement for Sale Not Proved as Plaintiff Failed to Establish Readiness and Willingness to Perform Contract.

The original plaintiff, Vijay Laxmipati Dasari (since deceased, represented by his legal heirs), filed a suit for specific performance of an agreement...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Awards Compensation for Illegal Detention by Police in Violation of D.K. Basu Guidelines. Petitioner was detained for six days without being produced before a magistrate, and the court held the State liable for constitutional tort.

The petitioner, Sagar Balu Ubhe, filed a writ petition alleging that he was illegally detained by the police from 25th to 30th January 2012. The Bomba...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Will in Property Dispute Between Heirs and Legatee. Will dated 7.1.1997 executed by Joao Francisco Lobo in favour of plaintiff No.1 held valid, dismissing appeals by both parties.

The dispute concerns a property at Calangute known as 'Sullachi Nhat' with a house, originally belonging to Joao Francisco Lobo and his wife. Joao Fra...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals in Property Dispute Over Will Validity and Adverse Possession. Court upholds trial court's finding that plaintiff failed to prove execution of will and defendants failed to prove adverse possession.

The case involves a property dispute between the plaintiffs (Carlos Tavora and others) and the defendants (Maria Felicidade Fernandes e Lobo and other...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Disturbed Under Section 100 CPC. Appellant failed to show any substantial question of law arising from concurrent findings of courts below regarding possession and title of suit property.

The case involves a second appeal filed by Sou. Sheetal Ulhas Dangi, who was the original defendant no.22, against the judgment and decree passed by t...