Search Results for "Appropriate Government"

12479 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 12479 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Relief to MMRDA in Metro Fare Dispute Under Section 9 of Arbitration Act. Court restrains Mumbai Metro One from revising fares higher than government-notified rates pending arbitration.

The Bombay High Court was hearing an arbitration petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed by the Mumbai Metropoli...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Writ Petition Filed by Builder Challenging Sealing of Property Under Enemy Property Act, 1968. Court Examines Legality of Order Passed by Deputy Secretary and Custodian After Earlier Withdrawal of Enemy Property Proceedings.

The petitioner, a partnership firm engaged as builder and developer, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Writ Petitions Challenging Karnataka On-Demand Transportation Technology Aggregators Rules, 2016. Petitioners Allege Rules Are Ultra Vires Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and Violate Fundamental Rights.

The writ petitions arose from the notification of the Karnataka On-Demand Transportation Technology Aggregators Rules, 2016, by the State Government o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Drug Manufacturer in NSQ Case Due to Prejudicial Delay in Testing. Delay of 20 Months in Analysis of Drug Sample Violated Right to Challenge Government Analyst's Report Under Section 25(3) of Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940.

The criminal petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, was filed by M/s Zim Laboratories Ltd. and its officers (the manufact...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Candidature in Municipal Elections. Court holds that the petitioner failed to establish that the respondent was not a Hindu or that he was not a member of the Scheduled Caste community, and that the Caste Scrutiny Committee's decision was not challenged.

The judgment involves two writ petitions filed by Smt. Chaitrali Prakash Borhade and Prem Seva Mahila Mandal & Anr. challenging the candidature of Raj...