GULFISHA FATIMA
1 Jan 1970The present appeals before the Supreme Court arise from a common judgment of the High Court of Delhi which affirmed the rejection of bail applications...
Search Results for "120B"
973 result(s) found
Found 973 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals by Private Company and Directors in Coal Scam Case, Upholds CBI Investigation. Post-Facto Consent Under Section 6 of DSPE Act Valid for Public Servants Not Named in FIR, Private Individuals Lack Locus to Challenge Investigation.
1 Jan 2020The Supreme Court dismissed appeals challenging the Allahabad High Court's order upholding CBI investigation in a coal scam case. The case arose from ...
- 423
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Bail Appeal in NIA Case — Accused No.16 in Terror Conspiracy Case Denied Bail Due to Prima Facie Involvement and Flight Risk. The court held that the accused's active participation in the conspiracy and the serious nature of offences under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 and Indian Penal Code, 1860 warranted denial of bail.
15 Jun 2023The appellant, Zabiulla @ Zabibulla, accused No.16 in Spl.C.C.No.320/2020, filed a criminal appeal under Section 21(4) of the National Investigation A...
- 123
High Court
Bombay High Court Grants Bail to Accused in Bhima Koregaon-Elgaar Parishad Case Under UAP Act — No Prima Facie Evidence of Conspiracy or Terrorist Act. Appellant's mere presence at meetings and sharing of social media posts does not constitute an offence under Sections 13, 16, 18, 20, 38, 39, 40 of UAP Act or Sections 120B, 115, 121, 121A, 124A, 153A, 505(1)(B), 34 IPC.
17 Oct 2022The appellant, Jyoti Jagtap, was arrested as accused No. 15 in FIR No. RC-01/2020/NIA/MUM registered by the National Investigation Agency (NIA) under ...
- 39
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Conviction of Bank Manager for Criminal Conspiracy and Corruption but Acquits Co-Accused for Lack of Evidence. The court found sufficient evidence against the Branch Manager for forging records and sanctioning loans without jewels, but no evidence against the loanee co-accused.
3 Oct 2019The Supreme Court of India heard appeals against a common judgment of the Madras High Court dated 21st July 2009, which upheld the conviction of T. Ma...
- 235
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Examines Appeal Against Conviction for Murder and Destruction of Evidence Under Sections 302 and 201 IPC. Evidence of Last Seen and Recovery of Weapon at Instance of Accused Considered in Light of Panch Witnesses' Hostile Testimony.
11 Oct 2022The criminal appeal arises from the judgment of the V-Additional District and Sessions Court, Mandya, in S.C. No.47/2011 dated 06.08.2016, convicting ...
- 18
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Former Police Officer in 29-Year-Old Murder Case. Court holds that custodial interrogation not required when appellant cooperates with investigation and no direct evidence links him to murder.
8 Sep 2020The Supreme Court considered an appeal against the dismissal of an anticipatory bail application by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana. The appellan...
- 403
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Removal of Employee Convicted of Theft While Under Suspension — Limitation Bar Applied for Delayed Challenge. The Court held that a removal order under Rule 19(i) of CCS (CCA) Rules is not a continuing wrong and delay of 13 years cannot be condoned without sufficient cause.
27 Aug 2019The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS) against the judgment of the Delhi High Court, which ...
- 219
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Accused in Gulshan Kumar Murder Case — Life Imprisonment for Murder and Attempt to Murder Confirmed. Evidence of Identification by Injured Witness and Recovery of Weapon Held Sufficient to Sustain Conviction Under Section 302 IPC.
1 Jul 2021The judgment pertains to the murder of Gulshan Kumar Dua, the founder of T-Series, who was shot dead on 12 August 1997. The appellant, Abdul Rauf Dawo...
- 58
High Court
Bombay High Court Nagpur Bench Hears Appeals Against Conviction and Acquittal in Kidnapping and Murder Case Under Indian Penal Code — Key reason: The appeals challenge the trial court's reliance on circumstantial evidence and the application of the last seen theory. The Court examined sufficiency of evidence under Sections 363, 302, 120B, 201 IPC and Section 27 of Evidence Act, and the State sought enhancement of sentence to capital punishment for the murder of a minor.
16 Apr 2019The Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, heard four criminal appeals arising from the judgment of the Sessions Judge, Akot, dated 1 June 2016, in Sessions...
