Search Results for "statutory purchase"

2806 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2806 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit Challenging Income Tax Order for Lack of Jurisdiction Under Section 269UN of Income Tax Act, 1961. Jurisdiction of Civil Court Barred as Appropriate Authority's Order Under Chapter XXC Is Final and Conclusive.

The plaintiff, Sasmita Investments Ltd., filed a suit in the Bombay High Court challenging an order passed by the Appropriate Authority under Chapter ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to MRT Order on Res Judicata in Tenancy Proceedings. Earlier Dismissal for Default Does Not Bar Subsequent Proceedings Under Section 32G of Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Land Act, 1948.

The petitioner, Ashish Chandrasingh Jhaveri, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging the order dated 2nd November, 2018 passed ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Supreme Court Clarifies Legislative Competence on Alcohol Regulation: Potable vs Industrial Alcohol" "A landmark judgment addressing the scope of State and Union powers on regulating alcohol under the Indian Constitution."

The Supreme Court of India revisited the legislative competence concerning the regulation of alcohol under the Constitution. The court examined whethe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka considers power of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal to direct fresh enquiry under Section 254 of Income Tax Act, 1961 in a buy-back taxation case. The court formulates the substantial question of law regarding suo motu directions leading to potential enhancement of tax liability.

The appeal before the High Court of Karnataka arose from an order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) concerning the tax treatment of a buy-ba...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Arbitration Award in Property Dispute — No Grounds for Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act. Court upholds award based on joint family property partition and limitation, finding no patent illegality or perversity.

The petitioners, who were members of a joint family, challenged an arbitral award passed in a partition dispute. The award had been made by an arbitra...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

NCLAT Allows Section 7 Petition in Insolvency Case Due to Acknowledgment of Debt in Balance Sheets and Emails. Repeated acknowledgment of debt by Corporate Debtor in balance sheets and emails extends limitation period under Section 18 of Limitation Act, 1963, saving the petition from being time-barred.

The case involves an appeal filed by Akzo Nobel India Ltd. (Financial Creditor) against Stan Cars Pvt. Ltd. (Corporate Debtor) under Section 61 of the...