Search Results for "section 70(1)"

377 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 377 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Bhaurao s/o Raghoji Ingole, a retired headmaster, was convicted by the Special Judge, Washim in Special Case No.2/2002 for offences und...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Insurance Appeals in Motor Accident and Workmen Compensation Cases — Upholds Awards for Injured Driver and Deceased Victim's Dependents. Insurer's Liability Affirmed Despite Alleged Policy Violations and Lack of Driving License.

The High Court of Karnataka at Dharwad disposed of a batch of miscellaneous first appeals filed by insurance companies against awards of compensation ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Upholds Arbitral Award Holding Stockbroker Liable for Unauthorized Trades by Agent. Broker Failed to Prove Client Authorization for Disputed Trades, Resulting in Compensation of Rs.14,37,200/- to Client.

The case involves an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed by IIFL Capital Services Limited (formerly IIFL Secu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Gujarat Partially Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Reduces Contributory Negligence from 10% to Nil and Enhances Income Assessment. Claimant's Income Reassessed at Rs.6,000 per Month Based on Rickshaw Driving Occupation, Resulting in Increased Compensation.

The appellant, Nizambhai Amadbhai Karavat, was the original claimant in a motor accident claim petition arising from an accident on 22.05.2015. While ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Revision Against Rejection of Plaint in Property Dispute — Plaint Discloses Cause of Action and Is Not Barred by Limitation. Order VII Rule 11 CPC Application Fails as Court Must Look Only at Plaint Averments and Not Evidence.

The applicant, Mr. Nilesh Sangodkar, filed a Civil Revision Application under Section 115 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908, challenging the order dat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Husband's Appeal in Divorce Case Due to Procedural Irregularities. Family Court Decree Set Aside for Failure to Frame Issues and Denial of Opportunity to Lead Evidence.

The appellant-husband challenged the judgment and decree dated 24th April 2015 passed by the Family Court at Bandra, Mumbai in Petition No. A-869 of 2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Husband's Right to Withdraw Consent in Mutual Divorce Case — Consent Withdrawal Permitted Before Final Decree Despite Settlement Before Marriage Counsellor Under Section 13-B of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.

The petitioner-wife and respondent-husband married on 24.04.2012 and separated in March 2013. The husband filed a divorce petition on the ground of de...