Search Results for "section 34"

603 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 603 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Construction Dispute — No Perversity Found in Award Granting Rs. 8,87,664 with Interest. Arbitrator's Findings Based on Documents and Not Open to Reappreciation Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, a Cooperative Housing Society, challenged an arbitral award dated 31 March 2010 passed by a sole arbitrator under Section 34 of the Ar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Dismisses Appeal Against Setting Aside of Arbitral Award Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Arbitrator's Award of Interest on Escalation Amount Upheld as Not Contrary to Contract Terms.

The case involves an appeal by Godawari Marathwada Irrigation Development Corporation against a judgment of the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Parbhani...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Arbitral Award Due to Unilateral Appointment of Arbitrator Without Consent. Arbitrator Appointed Without Consent of Both Parties Lacks Jurisdiction Under Section 11(6) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, M/s. Reliance Webstore Pvt. Ltd., filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Insurance Company's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Trust and Coverage Dispute. Majority Award Upheld as Not Patently Illegal Under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, The New India Insurance Company Limited, challenged an arbitral award dated 27 July 2009 passed by a three-member Arbitral Tribunal un...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses ONGC's Challenge to Arbitral Award Rejecting Claim as Time-Barred. Claim for pre-project expenses under MOU held barred by limitation as expenditure incurred prior to April 2001 and claim raised after three years.

The Petitioner, Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Limited (ONGC), challenged an arbitral award dated 12 November 2009 passed by the Arbitral Tribunal co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Arbitral Award in Advertising Contract Dispute — Petitioner's Challenge Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Fails. Court Held That Arbitrator's Findings on Breach and Quantum Were Not Patently Illegal or Against Public Policy.

The petitioner, M/s Maneesh Pharmaceuticals Limited, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challenging an ar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Challenge to Arbitral Award Rejecting Claim Over Stilt Parking Spaces. Court upholds arbitrator's interpretation that development agreement did not grant developer right to sell stilt car parking lots.

The petitioner, M/s. M. Mamotra Associates, a developer, entered into a Development Agreement dated 20 February 2006 with the respondent, Leela Raj 'A...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Arbitration Petition for Lack of Jurisdiction in Stock Broker Dispute. Seat of Arbitration Determined by NSEIL Byelaws, Not by Agreement Clause.

The petitioner, Kantilal Chhaganlal Securities Private Limited, a stock broker, challenged an arbitral award dated 29 April 2010 passed by a panel of ...