Search Results for "school admission register"

558 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 558 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Testimony and Lack of Corroboration — Conviction for Aggravated Penetrative Sexual Assault and Sexual Assault Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt

The case involves two criminal appeals filed by Gautam Chandrakant Khairnar and Bhaiyya @ Sharad Chandrakant Khairnar against their conviction under t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Hostile Witnesses and Lack of Evidence. Conviction under Section 354-A IPC, Section 363/511 IPC, and Section 8 POCSO Act Set Aside as Prosecution Fails to Prove Case Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The case arises from an incident on 26 January 2016, when the informant, a 16-year-old girl, along with her cousin sister, was walking to school for R...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Accused in POCSO and IPC Case — Victim's Testimony Found Credible Despite Minor Inconsistencies. Medical Evidence Corroborates Sexual Assault; Extortion and Criminal Intimidation Charges Sustained Under Sections 384 and 506 IPC.

The appellant, Sandip Hariprasad Pande, was convicted by the Special Judge, Nagpur in Special Child Protection Case No.63/2015 for offences under Sect...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Failure to Prove Age of Victim. Conviction under Sections 363, 377, 323 IPC and Section 4 POCSO Act set aside as prosecution failed to establish victim's minority and guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Pankaj Dadarao Ambadkar, was convicted by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-1 & Special Judge, Achalpur in Special (POCSO) Case No....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Independent Witnesses and Unreliable Trap Proceedings. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) r/w 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, G B Jagadeesh, was convicted by the Special Judge, Davanagere, in Spl.C.(Lokayukta) No.9/2007 for offences under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) r...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Based on Consent and Promise of Marriage — Failure to Prove Ingredients of Rape Under Section 375 IPC. Evidence of Victim Contradictory and Medical Evidence Inconsistent with Prosecution Story.

The applicant, Pravin @ Shrikrishna Chandrakant Marathe, was convicted by the Assistant Sessions Judge, Sindhudurg, for offences under Sections 376, 4...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO and Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 376 IPC and Section 4 read with Section 3 of POCSO Act set aside as prosecutrix's testimony was unreliable and medical evidence did not support rape.

The case involves three appellants: Ganesh @ Gorakh Tatyarao Jadhav (original accused No. 1), Muskan w/o Shaikh Rashid @ Rafiq (original accused No. 2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Rape and Kidnapping of Minor - Seven-Year Sentence Affirmed. Consistent Testimony of Prosecutrix and Medical Evidence Sufficient to Sustain Conviction Under Sections 363 and 376 IPC.

The appellant, Balaji Maruti Kamble, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Latur, for offences under Sections 363 and 376 of the Indian Pena...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Rape of Minor in Absence of Direct Evidence of Penetration. Circumstantial Evidence and Medical Report Sufficient to Prove Guilt Under Section 376(2)(f) IPC.

The appellant, Deepak Shankarrao Borkar, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Wardha, in Special Case No. 7 of 2012 for offences under Sect...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Rape Conviction in Revision — Sentence Reduced to 4 Years R.I. Based on Credible Testimony of Prosecutrix Under Section 376 IPC. Minor Contradictions in Prosecution Evidence Do Not Warrant Acquittal as Testimony of Victim is Found Reliable and Trustworthy.

The applicant, Tekaram s/o Krishna Ghormare, was convicted under Section 376 IPC by the 2nd Ad-hoc Assistant Sessions Judge, Bhandara on 18.12.2003 in...