Search Results for "revisional order"

2559 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2559 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Cancellation of Fair Price Shop Authorization Due to Violation of Natural Justice. Petitioner's authorization cancelled without notice or opportunity of hearing, and appellate order also set aside for lack of proper consideration.

The petitioner, Sri Manjunath, was a fair price shop dealer authorized under the Essential Commodities Act, 1955. His authorization was cancelled by t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes Show Cause Notices in Tenancy Case Due to 33-Year Delay and Land Conversion -- Proceedings Under Bombay Tenancy Act Barred When Land Converted to Non-Agricultural Use

The petitioners challenged show cause notices issued under Section 84C of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Land Act, 1948 regarding land transactio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Examines Whether Writ Petition Against Minister’s Order Under APMC Act Must Be Filed Before Division Bench Due to Lack of Locus Standi of Petitioners. Petitioners Challenge Amalgamation Order Passed Without Jurisdiction Under Section 43 of Maharashtra APMC Act.

The matter arose from a dispute concerning the amalgamation of Agricultural Produce Market Committee (APMC), Motala with APMC, Malkapur. Petitioners, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Mutation Entries in Land Revenue Records, Upholding Concurrent Findings of Civil Courts. Petitioners failed to establish possession or title over suit lands; mutation entries held not conferring title under Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966.

The case involves multiple writ petitions filed by various petitioners challenging mutation entries made in the revenue records in favor of the origin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Section 14 SARFAESI Proceedings Due to Availability of Alternative Remedy Under Section 17. Cooperative Bank's Recovery Action Upheld as Writ Not Maintainable When Statutory Remedy Exists.

The petitioners, Pimpri Chinchwad Sahakari Bank Maryadit and its Special Recovery Officer, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Orders Rejecting Condonation of Delay in Customs and Central Excise Appeals; Directs Fresh Consideration. Appellate Authorities Failed to Exclude Time Taken in Prosecuting Writ Petitions Before Filing Statutory Appeals, as Required Under Section 14(2) of Limitation Act, 1963.

The judgment arises from two writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court. The lead petition, WP N...