Search Results for "rashness and negligence"

306 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 306 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Gujarat Allows Partly Appellant in Motor Accident Claim for Enhancement of Compensation. Quantum Enhanced by Adding Future Prospects, Pain and Suffering, Loss of Amenities, and Artificial Limb Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The case arose out of a motor vehicle accident that occurred on 11.01.2017, when the appellant, Bharatbhai Mansukhbhai Rana, was struck by a rashly dr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case — Enhances Compensation by Applying Correct Multiplier and Future Prospects. Contributory Negligence Finding Set Aside as No Evidence of Negligence by Deceased Driver.

The case arises from a motor accident claim filed by the legal heirs of Hamirji Virchandbhai Thakor, who died in a vehicular accident on 2nd September...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Enhances Compensation for Motor Accident Victim with Permanent Disability. Claimant awarded Rs. 2,00,000/- for injuries and loss of earning capacity under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The appellant, Tejabai w/o Vaijnath Suryawanshi, originally a claimant, filed a first appeal before the Bombay High Court seeking enhancement of compe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim for Businessman with 50% Disability. Compensation enhanced from Rs. 3,50,000 to Rs. 9,27,000 by applying correct multiplier of 18, adding future prospects, and not deducting personal expenses.

The appellant, Ramchand Kishnani, a businessman aged 42, filed a claim petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, seeking compensatio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Gujarat Reduces Compensation in Motor Accident Claim Due to Lack of Income Proof and Incorrect Multiplier Application. Claimant's Cross-Objection Dismissed as Tribunal's Award Was Not Inadequate Under Section 166 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The case arises from a motor accident on 16.08.1992 when the original claimant, Kaushikbhai Dhansukhlal Shah, was riding his scooter on Makarpura Road...