Search Results for "public substantially interested"

273 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 273 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Declares Transfer Void Under Section 531(1) of Companies Act, 1956 in Winding-Up Proceedings. Related party transaction without registered deed held to be fraudulent preference.

The High Court of Bombay, in its Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction, considered Official Liquidator Report No. 34 of 2025 in Company Petition No. 19...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Motive. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Syed Vaseem, was convicted by the Principal Sessions Judge, Bengaluru Rural District, for the murder of one person under Section 302 IP...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Challenge to Majority Arbitral Award in Insurance Dispute — JSW Steel Ltd. v. ICICI Lombard General Insurance Company Ltd. — Challenge to Rejection of Claims Under Fire, Marine, and Business Interruption Policies Dismissed as No Patent Illegality Found.

The Petitioner, JSW Steel Ltd., engaged in steel manufacturing, had insured its plant at Toranagallu, Karnataka, under five insurance policies issued ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Quashing of FIR in Matrimonial Dispute Due to Settlement and Divorce by Mutual Consent. The Court held that non-compoundable offences under Section 498A IPC can be quashed under Section 482 CrPC to secure the ends of justice when parties have genuinely settled.

The petitioner-husband filed a criminal application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking quashing of FIR No. 282/2012 re...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Applicability of Biological Diversity Rules to Indian Entities. Rule 17 of Biological Diversity Rules, 2004 and Benefit Sharing Regulations Apply to All Entities, Not Just Foreign Entities.

The petitioners, comprising an association of Ayurvedic drug manufacturers and individual companies, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Upholds Concurrent Findings of Readiness and Willingness. Agreement to Sell for Shop Premises Enforced as Plaintiff Proved Continuous Readiness and Defendants Failed to Execute Sale Deed Despite Receiving Earnest Money.

The respondent (original plaintiff) filed Special Civil Suit No.136 of 1987 for specific performance of an agreement to sell dated 19.7.1987, whereby ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Copyright Infringement Case — No Prima Facie Case for Injunction Against Film Release. Plaintiff Failed to Establish Sufficient Similarity Between His Story and the Film 'Jannat 2' to Restrain Its Release.

The appellant, Kapil Chopra, filed a suit against Kunal Deshmukh (director), Vishesh Films India Pvt. Ltd. (producer), and Fox Star Studios Private Li...