Search Results for "psychotropic substances"

522 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 522 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition to Defreeze Bank Accounts in NDPS Act Case — Petitioner Company Not an Accused Under Section 68F. Freezing order under Section 68F of NDPS Act, 1985 cannot be sustained against a company that is not an accused in the predicate offence.

The petitioner, M/s. Ownpath Learning Private Limited, a registered startup under DPIIT, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Const...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order in Telangana Case -- Daughter's Appeal Succeeds on Grounds of Insufficient Material for Public Order Threat

The Supreme Court allowed an appeal challenging the preventive detention order against Aruna Bai alias Anguri Bai under the Telangana Prevention of Da...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Grants Default Bail to Accused in NDPS Case Despite Cognizance. Right to Default Bail Under Section 167(2) Cr.P.C. is Indefeasible and Not Extinguished by Filing of Charge Sheet or Taking of Cognizance Under Section 36A NDPS Act.

The petitioner, Shivaraj Urs, accused No.2 in Special CC No.1197/2019 pending before the Special Judge for NDPS cases, Bengaluru, filed a criminal pet...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Forfeiture of Flat Under NDPS Act Due to Res Judicata and Delay. Earlier Dismissal of Writ Petitions and SLP Bar Re-agitation of Same Issues Under Article 226.

The petitioners, Smt. Gulbanu Hassanali Rupani (aged 85) and Smt. Hasina S. Hemani, filed a criminal writ petition under Article 226 of the Constituti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Defreezing of Bank Account in NDPS Case Due to Non-Confirmation of Freezing Order Within 30 Days Under Section 68-F(2) of NDPS Act, 1985. Petitioner's claim as proprietor not barred by earlier statement under Section 67.

The petitioner, Jatinder Kaur Chilotra, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 3 December 202...