WRIT PETITION NO. 3310 OF 2017
5 Jun 2017...
Search Results for "original cash advance"
457 result(s) found
Found 457 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging SDO Order Remanding Sawmill Fine Case for Fresh Panchnama. Tahsildar's fine for illegal timber possession set aside due to lack of proper enquiry and violation of natural justice.
10 Jun 2013The petitioner, Vasant Govind Rajguru, a sawmill owner in Jamkhed, Ahmednagar, challenged the order dated 05.01.2012 passed by the Sub Divisional Offi...
- 109
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses State's Appeal in Arbitration Case Over Supervision Charges. The Court upheld the Arbitral Award disallowing supervision charges, finding no patent illegality in the Arbitrator's interpretation of the contract terms under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, and rejected the waiver argument as the objection was raised in the Section 37 appeal.
8 Nov 2021The dispute arose from an agreement dated 30 August 1979 between the State of Madhya Pradesh and M/s Sal Udyog Private Limited for the supply of Sal s...
- 217
High Court
Bombay High Court Reserved Judgment in Writ Petitions Challenging Fee Notification for FL-III Liquor Licenses Amid COVID-19 Restrictions. Hotel associations and operators contested the validity of the 28 January 2021 notification increasing license fees under the Maharashtra Prohibition Act and Rules, seeking reduction or installment facilities due to pandemic-related operating restrictions.
29 Mar 2022The Bombay High Court heard two writ petitions filed by hotel associations and individual operators holding FL-III licenses for vending foreign liquor...
- 28
High Court
Karnataka High Court Allows Revision Petition in Property Declaration Suit — Order VII Rule 11(d) CPC Application Rejected as Plaint Discloses Cause of Action. Court holds that the plaint cannot be rejected under Order VII Rule 11(d) CPC when the plaintiff's claim is based on a different title and the earlier decree is challenged as not binding.
23 Jun 2023The case arises from a civil revision petition filed by the petitioner (defendant No.1 in the original suit) challenging the order dated 02.06.2022 pa...
- 128
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Reserves Judgment in Writ Petition Against CIC Order Directing Disclosure of Husband's Income Tax Returns Under RTI Act. Petitioner Contended That Information Is Exempt Under Section 8(1)(e) of Right to Information Act, 2005, Being Held in Fiduciary Capacity by Income Tax Department.
21 Feb 2026This writ petition was filed by the Income Tax Officer and Chief Public Information Officer (CPIO) of the Income Tax Department's Centralised Processi...
- 24
High Court
High Court of Judicature at Bombay Dismisses Writ Petition Against Service Tax on Seed Supply and Allows Writ Against Sales Tax on Franchise Agreement. Technology-Embedded Seed Supply Held to Be a Sale Under MVAT Act, While Franchise Licensing Held to Be a Service Under Finance Act.
11 Aug 2016The High Court of Judicature at Bombay heard together two writ petitions concerning the tax characterisation of commercial transactions under the serv...
- 21
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Acquits Appellants in CBI Bank Fraud Case Due to Lack of Evidence. Conviction under Sections 120(B), 409, 467, 471, 477(A) IPC and Prevention of Corruption Act set aside as prosecution failed to prove criminal conspiracy and dishonest misappropriation.
3 Jan 2017The judgment pertains to three criminal appeals filed by Jitender Prasad Kaushik (A1), Raphael Joseph Manohar (A2), and another appellant (A3) against...
- 47
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Admission of Winding-Up Petition Against Telecom Company Due to Substratum Erosion and Deadlock. Cancellation of 2G Licences and Irreconcilable Differences Between Equal Shareholders Justify Winding-Up Under Section 433(f) of the Companies Act, 1956.
8 Apr 2014The appeal arose from an order of the company judge admitting a petition for winding up of Etisalat D.B. Telecom Limited (the company) under Section 4...
- 18
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Labour Court and Industrial Court Orders, Sustains Dismissal of Bus Conductor for Misconduct of Reselling Used Tickets and Cash Shortfall. Failure to frame preliminary issues on fairness of domestic enquiry and perversity of findings vitiates decisions, and employer's right to lead evidence, once reserved in written statement, must be afforded before final adjudication.
7 May 2018The dispute arose from the dismissal of a bus conductor by the Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation (the employer) for misconduct involving re...
- 18
