KAHC020009812016_1
28 Apr 2016...
Search Results for "negligent act"
2495 result(s) found
Found 2495 result(s)
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dharwad Bench Hears Batch of Motor Accident Claims Appeals Against Awards of Additional MACT, Kumta. Claimants Seek Enhancement of Compensation and Insurers Challenge Liability in Multiple Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Cases.
28 Mar 2019The matter involves a batch of appeals filed under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 against the judgment and award dated 31.12.2011 pass...
- 26
High Court
High Court of Karnataka, Kalaburagi Bench Disposes of Multiple Motor Accident Claims Appeals under Section 173(1) of MV Act. The appeals arose from awards of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal concerning compensation for injuries and deaths in road accidents.
22 Dec 2020The High Court of Karnataka, Kalaburagi Bench heard a batch of miscellaneous first appeals filed under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988,...
- 48
High Court
Bombay High Court Commercial Division Considers Section 34 Petition Against Arbitral Award Imposing Liability on Depository for Broker's Actions. The petition challenges the award's finding that CDSL must indemnify investor for breach by its depository participant despite the broker's misuse of power of attorney.
1 Dec 2025Background: The petition pertains to a challenge under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 against an arbitral award that held th...
- 14
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Insurance Company's Petition Challenging Tribunal's Refusal to Implead Additional Witnesses in Motor Accident Claim — No Jurisdictional Error Found in Tribunal's Discretionary Order. The Court held that the Tribunal's decision to reject impleadment of proposed respondents as unnecessary parties does not warrant interference under Article 227 of the Constitution of India.
22 Apr 2025The judgment pertains to two writ petitions filed by the Manager of ICICI Lombard General Insurance Company Limited under Article 227 of the Constitut...
- 19
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Kalaburagi Bench Disposes Multiple Motor Accident Claims Appeals Filed Under Section 173(1) of MV Act. Batch of appeals against MACT awards involving compensation enhancement and insurance liability disputes.
22 Dec 2020The provided text is a compilation of multiple Motor Accident Claims appeals (MFA) listed before the Karnataka High Court, Kalaburagi Bench on 22 Dece...
- 20
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Enhances Compensation for Death in Motor Accident - Negligence of KSRTC Bus Driver Established. The Court held that the deceased's income should include future prospects and applied a multiplier of 17 under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, enhancing the award from Rs. 21,28,774 to Rs. 13,59,000.
21 Oct 2013The case involves two appeals arising from a motor accident claim. The claimants, Smt. Sumathi B.S. (wife), Kum. P. Deepika @ Chandana (minor daughter...
- 58
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Hospital to Continue Treatment of Elderly Patient on Good Samaritan Basis, Quashes Senior Citizen Tribunal Order for Custody. The Court held that the Senior Citizen Tribunal lacked jurisdiction to order custody of a patient undergoing medical treatment, and the hospital's role as temporary guardian on Good Samaritan basis is valid under the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007.
17 Nov 2025The Bandra Holy Family Hospital Society and the Bandra Holy Family Hospital filed a writ petition challenging an order of the Senior Citizen Tribunal,...
- 164
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Stays Gauhati High Court's Direction to Prosecute Motor Vehicle Offences Only Under MV Act — Issue of Prosecution Under IPC Left Open. The Court Held That the MV Act Is Primarily a Beneficial Legislation for Compensation and Chapter XIII Deals with Regulatory Offences, Not Barring IPC Prosecution.
4 Oct 2019The case arose from a judgment of the Gauhati High Court, Agartala bench, dated 22.12.2008, which held that road traffic offences should be prosecuted...
- 539
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Revision, Sets Aside Conviction in Fatal Jeep Accident Case Due to Unproven Medical Evidence and Unreliable Witnesses. The court held that reversal of acquittal was unjustified when post-mortem report was not proved and only one eyewitness supported the prosecution.
5 Feb 2024The applicant, Anita Sopan Ravalekar, was initially acquitted by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Bhor, for offences under Sections 279, 304A, 337...
- 57
