Search Results for "mortgage enforcement"

398 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 398 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Tahsildar's Endorsement Rejecting Mutation Entry for Land Granted Under Section 94 of Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964. Revenue Authorities Cannot Adjudicate Title or Validity of Grant in Mutation Proceedings; Mutation Entries Are Only for Fiscal Purposes.

The petitioners, five individuals, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka at...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Reverses High Court Judgment in SARFAESI Act Case Due to Non-Compliance and Limitation. Bank's Auction Sale Upheld as Borrower's Challenge Was Time-Barred and Requests Did Not Trigger Statutory Obligations Under Section 13(3A) of SARFAESI Act, 2002.

The dispute arose from proceedings under the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (SAR...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Debenture Trustee's Claim for Payment from Suit Amount Held by Court Receiver in Priority Over Assignee of Decree. The court held that an assignee of a decree steps into the shoes of the assignor and cannot claim priority over the original decree holder who is a debenture trustee.

The dispute arose from a suit filed by ICICI Bank Ltd. (plaintiff) as debenture trustee for holders of 15% non-convertible debentures issued by Pal Pe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal by Decree-Holder in Execution Proceedings, Setting Aside Dismissal as Time-Barred. The court held that filing chamber summons and other applications constituted steps in aid of execution, extending limitation under Article 136 of the Limitation Act, 1963.

The case involves an appeal by Pratap G. Somaiya (the appellant/decree-holder) against an order dismissing his execution application as time-barred. T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Review Petition in Debt Recovery Case — No Error Apparent on Record. Review Petition under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC fails as petitioner failed to deposit amount as directed, and no grounds for review were made out.

The petitioner, M/s MRB Roadconst. Pvt. Ltd., filed a Review Petition before the Bombay High Court seeking review of an order dated 10th June 2015 pas...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Directors and Officers in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Absence of Specific Allegations. Vicarious Liability Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Requires Specific Averments of Role in Issuance of Cheque.

The petitioners, including M/s. GIC Housing Finance Ltd. and its directors/officers, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution read ...