Search Results for "minor prosecutrix"

390 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 390 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Procedural Defects and Insufficient Evidence - Fundamental Error in Framing Charge Under Deleted Provision and Inconsistent Testimony Fail to Sustain Conviction Under IPC

The High Court allowed the criminal appeal filed by Appellant against his conviction and life imprisonment under Section 376(3) of the Indian Penal Co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in POCSO and Child Marriage Case Due to Consensual Relationship and Marriage After Majority. FIR under Sections 64(1) BNS, 4(1) and 8 POCSO Act, and Sections 9, 10, 11 of Prohibition of Child Marriage Act Quashed as Victim Attained Majority and Consented to Marriage.

The applicants, including the husband and his family members, sought quashing of FIR No.196/2025 registered at Telhara Police Station for offences und...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Stepfather in Rape Case Due to Lack of Corroboration and Inconsistent Testimony of Victim. Conviction under Sections 376 and 506(ii) IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Sameer Sarkar, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Goa for offences under Sections 376 and 506(ii) of the Indian Penal Code...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Convict in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Consent — Conviction Under Section 376 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Absence of Consent Beyond Reasonable Doubt

The appellant, Munja s/o Jijabhau Bhange, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Parbhani, for an offence punishable under Section 376 of the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO and Kidnapping Case Due to Inconsistent Victim Testimony. Victim's Admission of Voluntary Association and Contradictions in Evidence Lead to Benefit of Doubt Under Section 366 IPC and Section 5(1) r/w Section 6 of POCSO Act.

The appellant, Popat Navasu Bendkoli, was convicted by the Special Judge (POCSO), Nashik, for offences under Section 366 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape of Minor Case Due to Material Contradictions and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 342 and 376(2)(f) IPC set aside as prosecutrix's testimony was inconsistent and medical evidence did not support forcible penetration.

The appellant, Vijay Prahlad Warankar, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Khamgaon on 24 July 1998 for offences under Sections 342 (wrong...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Unnatural Offence Under Section 377 IPC. Minor Inconsistencies in Evidence Do Not Warrant Interference in Revision as Testimony of Prosecutrix and Medical Evidence Support Conviction.

The applicant, Gulab s/o Shripat Sable, was convicted by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Washim, for an offence under Section 377 of the Indian P...